Dem Who Sparked Impeachment Push: We Don’t Want Trump Monarchy | The Beat With Ari Melber | MSNBC
Articles Blog

Dem Who Sparked Impeachment Push: We Don’t Want Trump Monarchy | The Beat With Ari Melber | MSNBC

September 10, 2019


GOOD EVENING.>>GOOD EVENING.>>GOOD EVENING. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. WE HAVE A LOT TO GET ON THIS WE HAVE A LOT TO GET ON THIS FRIDAY NIGHT. FRIDAY NIGHT. WE BEGIN WITH THIS DEBATE IN WE BEGIN WITH THIS DEBATE IN WASHINGTON AND LIVING ROOMS WASHINGTON AND LIVING ROOMS ACROSS THE COUNTRY. ACROSS THE COUNTRY. WHETHER OR NOT IT WOULD BE TIME WHETHER OR NOT IT WOULD BE TIME ON IMPEACH THE PRESIDENT OF THE ON IMPEACH THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. UNITED STATES. CONSIDER THIS NEW REPORTING FROM CONSIDER THIS NEW REPORTING FROM NBC NEWS. NBC NEWS. AT LEAST 38 HOUSE DEMOCRATS NOW AT LEAST 38 HOUSE DEMOCRATS NOW CALLING FOR DEMOCRATS TO BEGIN CALLING FOR DEMOCRATS TO BEGIN IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDINGS. IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDINGS. THAT WOULD BE BEFORE IMPEACHING THAT WOULD BE BEFORE IMPEACHING PRESIDENT TRUMP BUT IT WOULD BE PRESIDENT TRUMP BUT IT WOULD BE QUITE THE STEP. QUITE THE STEP. SIGNS THEY ARE NOT ALONE, TODAY SIGNS THEY ARE NOT ALONE, TODAY FORMER REPUBLICAN CONGRESSMAN FORMER REPUBLICAN CONGRESSMAN JOINS THE ONLY SERVING HOUSE JOINS THE ONLY SERVING HOUSE MEMBER TO SAY THAT DONALD TRUMP MEMBER TO SAY THAT DONALD TRUMP IN THEIR VIEW COMMIT IMPEACHABLE IN THEIR VIEW COMMIT IMPEACHABLE OFFENSES. OFFENSES. CALLING TO IMPEACH ON A NOW ESAY CALLING TO IMPEACH ON A NOW ESAY SAYING OUR VERY SURVIVAL IS AT SAYING OUR VERY SURVIVAL IS AT RISK. RISK. ALL OF THIS AFTER A WILD WEEK OF ALL OF THIS AFTER A WILD WEEK OF ESCALATING TENSIONS OVER ESCALATING TENSIONS OVER IMPEACHMENT. IMPEACHMENT.>>IF DON McGAHN DOESN’T TEFRGS>>IF DON McGAHN DOESN’T TEFRGS IT IS TIME ON OPEN AN INQUIRY. IT IS TIME ON OPEN AN INQUIRY.>>KEY DEMOCRATS PRESSED HOUSE>>KEY DEMOCRATS PRESSED HOUSE SPEAKER NANCY PELOSI TO MOVE SPEAKER NANCY PELOSI TO MOVE FORWARD WITH AN IMPEACHMENT FORWARD WITH AN IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY. INQUIRY.>>THIS IS NO LONGER ABOUT>>THIS IS NO LONGER ABOUT POLITICS BUT UPHOLDING THE RULE POLITICS BUT UPHOLDING THE RULE OF LAW. OF LAW.>>WE BELIEVE THE PRESIDENT OF>>WE BELIEVE THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES IS ENGAGED IN THE UNITED STATES IS ENGAGED IN A COVER-UP. A COVER-UP.>>I WALK IN TO LOOK AT PEOPLE>>I WALK IN TO LOOK AT PEOPLE THAT HAVE JUST SAID THAT I WAS THAT HAVE JUST SAID THAT I WAS DOING A COVER-UP. DOING A COVER-UP. I DON’T DO COVER-UPS. I DON’T DO COVER-UPS. THE I-WORD. THE I-WORD. THE I-WORD. THE I-WORD. CAN YOU IMAGINE? CAN YOU IMAGINE?>>THE HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CAUCUS>>THE HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CAUCUS DOES NOT WANT TO PASS TO DOES NOT WANT TO PASS TO IMPEACHMENT AND THAT’S WHERE HE IMPEACHMENT AND THAT’S WHERE HE WANT US TO BE. WANT US TO BE.>>SHE SAYS THAT YOU WANT TO BE>>SHE SAYS THAT YOU WANT TO BE IMPEACHED. IMPEACHED. DO YOU WANT TO BE IMPEACHED? DO YOU WANT TO BE IMPEACHED?>>I DON’T THINK ANYONE WANTS TO>>I DON’T THINK ANYONE WANTS TO BE IMPEACHED. BE IMPEACHED.>>A BIG QUESTION TONIGHT, HOW>>A BIG QUESTION TONIGHT, HOW MUCH LONGER CAN DEMOCRATIC MUCH LONGER CAN DEMOCRATIC LEADERS HOLD OFF IF THE RANK AND LEADERS HOLD OFF IF THE RANK AND FILE AIDED BY THESE NEW FILE AIDED BY THESE NEW REPUBLICAN VOICES IN THE REPUBLICAN VOICES IN THE WILDERNESS ARE BACKING WILDERNESS ARE BACKING IMPEACHMENT OR IMPEACHMENT IMPEACHMENT OR IMPEACHMENT HEARINGS. HEARINGS. WHAT WILL THEY HEAR FROM THE MAN WHAT WILL THEY HEAR FROM THE MAN WHO COULD BE THEIR STAR WITNESS? WHO COULD BE THEIR STAR WITNESS? BOB MUELLER. BOB MUELLER.>>MUELLER, I THINK I CAN SAY AT>>MUELLER, I THINK I CAN SAY AT THIS POINT THAT HE WANTS TO THIS POINT THAT HE WANTS TO TESTIFY IN PRIVATE. TESTIFY IN PRIVATE.>>WHY?>>WHY?>>I DON’T KNOW WHY.>>I DON’T KNOW WHY. HE WANTS — HE’S WILLING TO MAKE HE WANTS — HE’S WILLING TO MAKE AN OPENING STATEMENT. AN OPENING STATEMENT. WE’RE SAYING THAT WE THINK IT IS WE’RE SAYING THAT WE THINK IT IS IMPORTANT FOR THE AMERICAN IMPORTANT FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE TO HEAR FROM HIM AND TO PEOPLE TO HEAR FROM HIM AND TO HEAR HIS ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS HEAR HIS ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS ABOUT THE REPORT. ABOUT THE REPORT.>>THAT’S SOME NEWS.>>THAT’S SOME NEWS. IN A MOMENT I’LL SPEAK ABOUT ALL IN A MOMENT I’LL SPEAK ABOUT ALL OF THIS WITH THE DEMOCRATIC OF THIS WITH THE DEMOCRATIC MEMBERS OF CONGRESS WHO IS MEMBERS OF CONGRESS WHO IS LEADING THE CHARGE FOR PEEMT LEADING THE CHARGE FOR PEEMT IMPEACHMENT. IMPEACHMENT. WE BEGIN FIRST, AND POLITICAL WE BEGIN FIRST, AND POLITICAL SCIENCE PROFESSOR AT FORDHAM. SCIENCE PROFESSOR AT FORDHAM. HAS PELOSI ON THIS WILD WEEK HAS PELOSI ON THIS WILD WEEK DONE ENOUGH IN YOUR VIEW TO HELD DONE ENOUGH IN YOUR VIEW TO HELD TO LINE OR ARE WE SEEING A SLOW TO LINE OR ARE WE SEEING A SLOW BUT STEADY MARCH THAN JUST A WAR BUT STEADY MARCH THAN JUST A WAR OF WORDS? OF WORDS?>>I THINK WE’RE SEEING THE>>I THINK WE’RE SEEING THE STEADY MARCH TOWARD IMPEACHMENT. STEADY MARCH TOWARD IMPEACHMENT. OBVIOUSLY NANCY PELOSI IS A OBVIOUSLY NANCY PELOSI IS A SCENICED LEGISLATOR AND SHE WAS SCENICED LEGISLATOR AND SHE WAS AROUND IN THE 1990s WHEN BILL AROUND IN THE 1990s WHEN BILL CLINTON WAS IMPEACHED. CLINTON WAS IMPEACHED. I THINK WHAT IS FRUSTRATING FOR I THINK WHAT IS FRUSTRATING FOR MANY DEMOCRATS WHO WANT MANY DEMOCRATS WHO WANT IMPEACHMENT, ESPECIALLY SOME OF IMPEACHMENT, ESPECIALLY SOME OF THE NEWER, YOUNGER DEMOCRATS THE NEWER, YOUNGER DEMOCRATS CALLING FOR IMPEACHMENT. CALLING FOR IMPEACHMENT. THEY’RE SAYING, THIS IS NOT THE THEY’RE SAYING, THIS IS NOT THE 1990s. 1990s. DONALD TRUMP IS NOT PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP IS NOT PRESIDENT CLINTON. CLINTON. THE CIRCUMSTANCES ARE COMPLETELY THE CIRCUMSTANCES ARE COMPLETELY DIFFERENT. DIFFERENT. WE WERE LOOKING AT SOMETHING WE WERE LOOKING AT SOMETHING WHERE IN THE LATE ’90s, WHERE IN THE LATE ’90s, PRESIDENT CLINTON, HIS WIFE, PRESIDENT CLINTON, HIS WIFE, OTHER ENTITIES, WE WERE NOT OTHER ENTITIES, WE WERE NOT LOOKING AT FULL WIDESPREAD LOOKING AT FULL WIDESPREAD CORRUPTION AND POSSIBLY THE CORRUPTION AND POSSIBLY THE DESTRUCTION OF AMERICAN DESTRUCTION OF AMERICAN DEMOCRACY IN OUR INSTITUTIONS. DEMOCRACY IN OUR INSTITUTIONS. THE DEMOCRATS SAW HOW THE DEMOCRATS SAW HOW REPUBLICANS WERE PUNISHED POST REPUBLICANS WERE PUNISHED POST IMPEACHMENT. IMPEACHMENT. I DON’T THINK THAT WE’RE IN THAT I DON’T THINK THAT WE’RE IN THAT SCENARIO AND THAT SITUATION. SCENARIO AND THAT SITUATION. SO THIS IS WHY SO MANY DEMOCRATS SO THIS IS WHY SO MANY DEMOCRATS SLOWLY BUT SURELY ARE SAYING, SLOWLY BUT SURELY ARE SAYING, THIS IS SOMETHING WE MUST DO. THIS IS SOMETHING WE MUST DO. WE DON’T KNOW IF OUR DEMOCRACY WE DON’T KNOW IF OUR DEMOCRACY CAN SURVIVE ANOTHER TWO TO SIX CAN SURVIVE ANOTHER TWO TO SIX YEARS OF A TRUMP PRESIDENCY. YEARS OF A TRUMP PRESIDENCY. AND A SIX FANTIC REPUBLICAN AND A SIX FANTIC REPUBLICAN CONGRESS THAT IS SIGNING CONGRESS THAT IS SIGNING EVERYTHING HE DOES. EVERYTHING HE DOES. NOW WE SEE THE DOJ WORKING FOR NOW WE SEE THE DOJ WORKING FOR THE PRESIDENT AND NOT THE THE PRESIDENT AND NOT THE CONSTITUTION. CONSTITUTION.>>YOU MENTIONED THE DOJ.>>YOU MENTIONED THE DOJ. THAT’S AN IMPORTANT POINT. THAT’S AN IMPORTANT POINT. IF YOU LOOK AT WHAT CHRISTINA IS IF YOU LOOK AT WHAT CHRISTINA IS SAYING, IT IS NOT LIKE THINGS SAYING, IT IS NOT LIKE THINGS JUST STAY THE SAME. JUST STAY THE SAME. IT IS NOT THAT PELOSI IS HOLDING IT IS NOT THAT PELOSI IS HOLDING THE LINE AND SAYING, THIS IS AS THE LINE AND SAYING, THIS IS AS BAD AS IT GETS IN THE VIEW OF BAD AS IT GETS IN THE VIEW OF THE DEMOCRATS. THE DEMOCRATS. A LOT OF EXPERTS AND A LOT OF EXPERTS AND PROGRESSIVES AND SOME PROGRESSIVES AND SOME REPUBLICANS, AS I SHOWED, ARE REPUBLICANS, AS I SHOWED, ARE SAYING, WELL, IT’S BEEN NEUTRAL. SAYING, WELL, IT’S BEEN NEUTRAL. BECAUSE THE TRUMP JUSTICE BECAUSE THE TRUMP JUSTICE DEPARTMENT IS BARRELING FORWARD DEPARTMENT IS BARRELING FORWARD TRYING TO INVESTIGATE THE TRYING TO INVESTIGATE THE INVESTIGATORS. INVESTIGATORS. THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES IS FALSELY ARGUABLY IN A STATES IS FALSELY ARGUABLY IN A DEFAMATORY WAY ACCUSING FORMER DEFAMATORY WAY ACCUSING FORMER INVESTIGATORS OF TREASON. INVESTIGATORS OF TREASON. SO WITH THAT IN MIND, DOES MORE SO WITH THAT IN MIND, DOES MORE NEED TO BE DONE ON HOUSE SIDE? NEED TO BE DONE ON HOUSE SIDE?>>YEAH.>>YEAH. I THINK IT DOES. I THINK IT DOES. FOR ALL THE REASONS THAT SHE FOR ALL THE REASONS THAT SHE SAID. SAID. BUT IN ADDITION TO YOUR POINT, BUT IN ADDITION TO YOUR POINT, DONALD TRUMP IS USING THE TOOLS DONALD TRUMP IS USING THE TOOLS AVAILABLE TO HIM AS PRESIDENT. AVAILABLE TO HIM AS PRESIDENT. AS THE WORLD’S MOST POWERFUL AS THE WORLD’S MOST POWERFUL PERSON FOR HIS OWN PERSONAL PERSON FOR HIS OWN PERSONAL GAIN. GAIN. THAT’S ESSENTIALLY WHAT HE’S THAT’S ESSENTIALLY WHAT HE’S ASKED WILLIAM BARR TO DO. ASKED WILLIAM BARR TO DO. IN GIVING HIM THIS UNPRECEDENTED IN GIVING HIM THIS UNPRECEDENTED POWER IN TERMS OF DECLASSIFYING POWER IN TERMS OF DECLASSIFYING NATIONAL SECURITY. NATIONAL SECURITY. AND YOU KNOW, IF YOU GO BACK TO AND YOU KNOW, IF YOU GO BACK TO WHAT IMPEACHMENT REPRESENTS, AT WHAT IMPEACHMENT REPRESENTS, AT LEAST THE PROCESS FOR CONGRESS LEAST THE PROCESS FOR CONGRESS TO TRY TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR TO TRY TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR WHAT ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT IT WHAT ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT IT MIGHT WRITE UP. MIGHT WRITE UP. THAT’S THE PROCESS. THAT’S THE PROCESS. THE HEARING PROCESS. THE HEARING PROCESS. THIS IS THE SAME ONE WE’VE SEEN THIS IS THE SAME ONE WE’VE SEEN IN THE REPORT THAT WAS ALREADY IN THE REPORT THAT WAS ALREADY SPUN IN A WAY THAT CONFUSED THE SPUN IN A WAY THAT CONFUSED THE AMERICAN PUBLIC ABOUT WHAT AMERICAN PUBLIC ABOUT WHAT ROBERT MUELLER FOUND INCLUDING ROBERT MUELLER FOUND INCLUDING EXPLICITLY SAYING, SIGNIFICANT EXPLICITLY SAYING, SIGNIFICANT EVIDENCE OF OBSTRUCTION OF EVIDENCE OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE. JUSTICE. BUT ALSO, THIS IS THE SAME BUT ALSO, THIS IS THE SAME PRESIDENT THAT OVERRODE NATIONAL PRESIDENT THAT OVERRODE NATIONAL SECURITY CLEARANCES FOR 25 SECURITY CLEARANCES FOR 25 PEOPLE IN THE WHITE HOUSE WHEN PEOPLE IN THE WHITE HOUSE WHEN THEN YOU SHOULD DECLINE THESE. THEN YOU SHOULD DECLINE THESE. SOME OF THOSE BEING HIS FAMILY SOME OF THOSE BEING HIS FAMILY MEMBERS. MEMBERS. SO THE POINT ABOUT, YOU KNOW, SO THE POINT ABOUT, YOU KNOW, THE HISTORY OF IMPEACHMENT IN THE HISTORY OF IMPEACHMENT IN THIS COUNTRY, WHAT THE THIS COUNTRY, WHAT THE UNDERPINNING OF THE CONSTITUTION UNDERPINNING OF THE CONSTITUTION IS, IS NOT ABOUT WHETHER OR NOT IS, IS NOT ABOUT WHETHER OR NOT THE PRESIDENT COULD BE CONVICTED THE PRESIDENT COULD BE CONVICTED OF A CRIME. OF A CRIME. IT IS MALADMINISTRATION. IT IS MALADMINISTRATION. IT IS ABUSE OF POWER. IT IS ABUSE OF POWER. AND CONGRESS HAS TO, IF IT IS AND CONGRESS HAS TO, IF IT IS GOING ON UPHOLD THE GOING ON UPHOLD THE CONSTITUTIONAL OBLIGATION, IT CONSTITUTIONAL OBLIGATION, IT HAS TO ACTUALLY CONSIDER AND HAS TO ACTUALLY CONSIDER AND LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE TO CONSIDER LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE TO CONSIDER WHETHER OR NOT TO HAVE ARTICLES WHETHER OR NOT TO HAVE ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT. OF IMPEACHMENT. JUST ONE OTHER QUICK POINT THAT JUST ONE OTHER QUICK POINT THAT I THINK IS SO INTERESTING IN THE I THINK IS SO INTERESTING IN THE POLLING. POLLING. A REASON POLL THAT JUST CAME OUT A REASON POLL THAT JUST CAME OUT SHOWED THAT EVEN WHILE AMERICANS SHOWED THAT EVEN WHILE AMERICANS ARE SAYING, I DON’T KNOW IF ARE SAYING, I DON’T KNOW IF CONGRESS SHOULD IMPEACH. CONGRESS SHOULD IMPEACH. THERE ARE ALSO 73% ARE SAYING THERE ARE ALSO 73% ARE SAYING THEY WANT TO HEAR FROM ROB THEY WANT TO HEAR FROM ROB MUELLER. MUELLER. AND 66% ARE SAYING, THEY WANT TO AND 66% ARE SAYING, THEY WANT TO HEAR FROM DON McGAHN. HEAR FROM DON McGAHN. THAT DOESN’T SOUND LIKE THE THAT DOESN’T SOUND LIKE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE THINK HAS THE AMERICAN PEOPLE THINK HAS THE DOOVER. DOOVER.>>INTERESTING.>>INTERESTING. BOTH OF YOU HANG WITH ME. BOTH OF YOU HANG WITH ME. I WANT TO TURN TO ONE OF THESE I WANT TO TURN TO ONE OF THESE MEMBERS OF CONGRESS AS WE’VE MEMBERS OF CONGRESS AS WE’VE BEEN DISCUSSING THE FIGHT. BEEN DISCUSSING THE FIGHT. HE INTRODUCED IMPEACHMENT THE. HE INTRODUCED IMPEACHMENT THE.>>THE I BELIEVE THAT THEY WILL.>>THE I BELIEVE THAT THEY WILL. BUT IT DEPENDS ON WHAT YOU MEAN BUT IT DEPENDS ON WHAT YOU MEAN BY NEAR FUTURE. BY NEAR FUTURE. I THINK SO. I THINK SO. I THINK WE’RE ON THE RIGHT PATH. I THINK WE’RE ON THE RIGHT PATH.>>IF THAT’S THE CASE, WHEN>>IF THAT’S THE CASE, WHEN WOULD THAT BEGIN IN YOUR VIEW? WOULD THAT BEGIN IN YOUR VIEW? WOULD THAT MEAN THE SPEAKER HAS WOULD THAT MEAN THE SPEAKER HAS HANNED THIS WRONGLY? HANNED THIS WRONGLY?>>ARE YOU SPEAKING TO ME, SIR?>>ARE YOU SPEAKING TO ME, SIR?>>OH.>>OH. YES. YES. I’M BEING TOLD WE’RE HAVING I’M BEING TOLD WE’RE HAVING AUDIO ISSUES AND THAT’S ON ME. AUDIO ISSUES AND THAT’S ON ME. I’LL REPEAT THE QUESTION. I’LL REPEAT THE QUESTION. THANK YOU FOR COMING. THANK YOU FOR COMING. ON I WAS PLAYING THAT SOUND OF ON I WAS PLAYING THAT SOUND OF YOU. YOU. WE HEARD BRIEFLY YOU IN THE WE HEARD BRIEFLY YOU IN THE HALLWAY TALKING ABOUT THE HALLWAY TALKING ABOUT THE POTENTIAL IMPEACHMENT POTENTIAL IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDINGS COMING 6:00. PROCEEDINGS COMING 6:00. I PUT THE QUESTION TO YOU, WHAT I PUT THE QUESTION TO YOU, WHAT DOES SOON MEAN? DOES SOON MEAN? DOES THAT MEAN THE SPEAKER HAS DOES THAT MEAN THE SPEAKER HAS HANNED THIS IN YOUR VIEW, HANNED THIS IN YOUR VIEW, WRONGLY? WRONGLY?>>WELL, THANK YOU FOR THE>>WELL, THANK YOU FOR THE QUESTION. QUESTION. SIR, WE ARE AT THE CROSS ROADS SIR, WE ARE AT THE CROSS ROADS OF ACCOUNTABILITY. OF ACCOUNTABILITY. THESE ARE THE CROSS ROADS FOR THESE ARE THE CROSS ROADS FOR THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. EITHER WE WILL HOLD THE EITHER WE WILL HOLD THE PRESIDENT ACCOUNTABLE, OR WE PRESIDENT ACCOUNTABLE, OR WE WILL BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE. WILL BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE. IT IS THAT SIMPLE. IT IS THAT SIMPLE. WE ARE PART OF THE ISSUE BEING WE ARE PART OF THE ISSUE BEING LITIGATED IN THE COURT OF PUBLIC LITIGATED IN THE COURT OF PUBLIC OPINION. OPINION. AND WHETHER OR NOT WE WILL AND WHETHER OR NOT WE WILL HANDLE THIS APPROPRIATELY HANDLE THIS APPROPRIATELY DEPENDS ON WHERE WE WILL PUT DEPENDS ON WHERE WE WILL PUT POLITICS ABOVE PRINCIPLE. POLITICS ABOVE PRINCIPLE. IF WE PUT POLITICS ABOVE IF WE PUT POLITICS ABOVE PRINCIPLE, WE WILL BE HELD PRINCIPLE, WE WILL BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE. ACCOUNTABLE. IF WE PUT PARTY ABOVE PEOPLE. IF WE PUT PARTY ABOVE PEOPLE. WE’LL BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE. WE’LL BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE. IF WE PUT THE PRESIDENT ABOVE IF WE PUT THE PRESIDENT ABOVE THE LAW, WE’LL BE HELD THE LAW, WE’LL BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE OF THERE’S NO MIDDLE ACCOUNTABLE OF THERE’S NO MIDDLE GROUND HERE. GROUND HERE.>>YOU PUT I SO CLEARLY THERE.>>YOU PUT I SO CLEARLY THERE. I THINK SOME VIEWERS LISTENING I THINK SOME VIEWERS LISTENING WOULD SAY WOW, THAT SOUNDS SO WOULD SAY WOW, THAT SOUNDS SO STRAIGHTFORWARD. STRAIGHTFORWARD. WHETHER WE NAME THEM OR NOT. WHETHER WE NAME THEM OR NOT. THERE ARE COLLEAGUES OF YOURS, THERE ARE COLLEAGUES OF YOURS, TEAMMATES OF YOURS STAYING TEAMMATES OF YOURS STAYING OPPOSITE. OPPOSITE. THEY’RE SAYING IF IT DOESN’T GET THEY’RE SAYING IF IT DOESN’T GET THROUGH SENATE. THROUGH SENATE. IF YOU CANNOT WIN OVER IF YOU CANNOT WIN OVER REPUBLICANS. REPUBLICANS. I THINK YOU’RE REFERRING TO I THINK YOU’RE REFERRING TO POLITICS. POLITICS. THEN IT IS NOT EVEN WORTH THEN IT IS NOT EVEN WORTH STARTING. STARTING. WHY IS THAT WRONG? WHY IS THAT WRONG?>>I DON’T SAY THEY’RE WRONG.>>I DON’T SAY THEY’RE WRONG. I THINK PEOPLE ARE ENTITLED TO I THINK PEOPLE ARE ENTITLED TO THEIR OPINIONS. THEIR OPINIONS. THIS STARTED SOME TIME AGO. THIS STARTED SOME TIME AGO. SOME TWO YEARS AGO. SOME TWO YEARS AGO. AND QUITE FRANKLY, I WAS ALONE AND QUITE FRANKLY, I WAS ALONE IN THIS PROCESS FOR A GOOD DEAL IN THIS PROCESS FOR A GOOD DEAL OF THE TIME. OF THE TIME. IT’S BETTER TO STAND ALONE THAN IT’S BETTER TO STAND ALONE THAN NOT STAND AT ALL. NOT STAND AT ALL. THERE ARE MANY PEOPLE BELIEVING THERE ARE MANY PEOPLE BELIEVING WE SHOULD STAND IN THE PROCESS. WE SHOULD STAND IN THE PROCESS. THERE WILL BE A MAJORITY OF THE THERE WILL BE A MAJORITY OF THE PEOPLE IN THE HOUSE OF PEOPLE IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES WHO WILL NOT REPRESENTATIVES WHO WILL NOT ALLOW THIS IMPEACHMENT MOVEMENT ALLOW THIS IMPEACHMENT MOVEMENT TO BE JUST TALKING POINTS. TO BE JUST TALKING POINTS. THEY WILL PUT PRINCIPLE ABOVE THEY WILL PUT PRINCIPLE ABOVE POLITICS. POLITICS. I BELIEVE WE’RE MOVING IN THE I BELIEVE WE’RE MOVING IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION. RIGHT DIRECTION. AND THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO AND THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO CURRENTLY ARE NOT QUITE THERE. CURRENTLY ARE NOT QUITE THERE. BUT I THINK HISTORY IS DRIVING BUT I THINK HISTORY IS DRIVING THIS NOW. THIS NOW. YOU KNOW, PEOPLE MAKE HISTORY YOU KNOW, PEOPLE MAKE HISTORY AND SOMETIMES HISTORY WILL MAKE AND SOMETIMES HISTORY WILL MAKE PEOPLE. PEOPLE. I THINK HISTORY WILL MAKE A LOT I THINK HISTORY WILL MAKE A LOT OF PEOPLE HAVE SECOND THOUGHTS OF PEOPLE HAVE SECOND THOUGHTS ABOUT POSITIONS THEY’VE HELD AND ABOUT POSITIONS THEY’VE HELD AND I THINK THEY’LL COME ON BOARD. I THINK THEY’LL COME ON BOARD.>>WHILE I HAVE YOU, I WANT TO>>WHILE I HAVE YOU, I WANT TO ASK ABOUT THE OTHER BIG NEWS. ASK ABOUT THE OTHER BIG NEWS. CHAIRMAN NADLER TELLING RACHEL CHAIRMAN NADLER TELLING RACHEL MADDOW LAST NIGHT THAT THEY’RE MADDOW LAST NIGHT THAT THEY’RE MOVING TOWARD POTENTIALLY MOVING TOWARD POTENTIALLY PRIVATE BOB MUELLER TESTIMONY. PRIVATE BOB MUELLER TESTIMONY. SO MY QUESTION TO YOU IS, IF SO MY QUESTION TO YOU IS, IF THIS IS SO IMPORTANT FOR PUBLIC THIS IS SO IMPORTANT FOR PUBLIC FACT, IF IT IS THE HOUSE AND THE FACT, IF IT IS THE HOUSE AND THE HOUSE’ SUBPOENA POWER WE’VE HOUSE’ SUBPOENA POWER WE’VE HEARD SO MUCH ABOUT, SHOULD NOT HEARD SO MUCH ABOUT, SHOULD NOT THE HOUSE DECIDE WHAT IS THE THE HOUSE DECIDE WHAT IS THE BEST COURSE AND NOT THE WITNESS? BEST COURSE AND NOT THE WITNESS? DO YOU THINK MR. MUELLER SHOULD DO YOU THINK MR. MUELLER SHOULD TAKE QUESTIONS IN PUBLIC? TAKE QUESTIONS IN PUBLIC?>>MR. MELBER, I HAVE ALREADY>>MR. MELBER, I HAVE ALREADY INDICATED THAT WE DON’T HAVE TO INDICATED THAT WE DON’T HAVE TO HAVE TESTIMONY. HAVE TESTIMONY. WHAT WAS GIVEN TO US BY THE WHAT WAS GIVEN TO US BY THE SPECIAL COUNSEL, WHAT WAS GIVEN SPECIAL COUNSEL, WHAT WAS GIVEN TO US IS MORE THAN ENOUGH. TO US IS MORE THAN ENOUGH. THE MUELLER REPORT LAYS IT OUT. THE MUELLER REPORT LAYS IT OUT. AND WE’VE HAD OVER 800 FORMER AND WE’VE HAD OVER 800 FORMER FEDERAL PROSECUTORS TO SAY IF FEDERAL PROSECUTORS TO SAY IF THIS WERE ANYONE OTHER THAN THE THIS WERE ANYONE OTHER THAN THE PRESIDENT, THE PERSON WOULD BE PRESIDENT, THE PERSON WOULD BE PROSECUTED. PROSECUTED. I BELIEVE WE HAVE ENOUGH I BELIEVE WE HAVE ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO GO FORWARD WITHOUT EVIDENCE TO GO FORWARD WITHOUT MR. MUELLER. MR. MUELLER. I THINK IT WORK BENEFICIAL TO I THINK IT WORK BENEFICIAL TO GET HIS TESTIMONY AND IN THE GET HIS TESTIMONY AND IN THE PRESENCE OF THE PUBLIC. PRESENCE OF THE PUBLIC. TRANSPARENCY WOULD BE GOOD. TRANSPARENCY WOULD BE GOOD. I WON’T QUARREL WITH HIM IF HE I WON’T QUARREL WITH HIM IF HE WANTS TO DO IT BEHIND CLOSED WANTS TO DO IT BEHIND CLOSED DOORS AFTER HAVING MADE A DOORS AFTER HAVING MADE A STATEMENT. STATEMENT. THE IMPORTANT THING ON REMEMBER THE IMPORTANT THING ON REMEMBER IS, THAT MR. COMEY WAS FIRED FOR IS, THAT MR. COMEY WAS FIRED FOR INVESTIGATING THE PRESIDENT. INVESTIGATING THE PRESIDENT. AND THE PRESIDENT CONFESSED TO AND THE PRESIDENT CONFESSED TO THAT. THAT. MR. MUELLER INVESTIGATED IT. MR. MUELLER INVESTIGATED IT. HE STARTED WITH THAT AS THE HE STARTED WITH THAT AS THE GENESIS. GENESIS. AND HE HAS CONCLUDED THAT HE AND HE HAS CONCLUDED THAT HE CANNOT INDICT THE PRESIDENT CANNOT INDICT THE PRESIDENT BECAUSE OF A STANDING POLICY. BECAUSE OF A STANDING POLICY. BY ALSO INDICATED, HE WAS NOT BY ALSO INDICATED, HE WAS NOT EXONERATED AND GAVE US SOME TEN EXONERATED AND GAVE US SOME TEN OR MORE REASONS WHY OBSTRUCTION OR MORE REASONS WHY OBSTRUCTION MAY HAVE TAKEN PLACE. MAY HAVE TAKEN PLACE. FOR US TO MOVE ON. FOR US TO MOVE ON. I THINK TO BE VERY HONEST WITH I THINK TO BE VERY HONEST WITH YOU, MR. MUELLER IS AN HONORABLE YOU, MR. MUELLER IS AN HONORABLE MAN AND HE UNDERSTANDS THE MAN AND HE UNDERSTANDS THE FRAMERS OF THE CONSTITUTION FRAMERS OF THE CONSTITUTION INTENDED THAT CONGRESS DO ITS INTENDED THAT CONGRESS DO ITS JOB. JOB. WE HAVE TO HAVE THE WILL, THE WE HAVE TO HAVE THE WILL, THE FRAMERS HAVE GIVEN US A WAY. FRAMERS HAVE GIVEN US A WAY. IF WE DON’T DO OUR JOB, HERE’S IF WE DON’T DO OUR JOB, HERE’S WHAT WILL HAPPEN. WHAT WILL HAPPEN. THE BALANCE OF POWER AS WE SEE THE BALANCE OF POWER AS WE SEE IT IN THIS COUNTRY, WILL BE IT IN THIS COUNTRY, WILL BE SHIFTED. SHIFTED. WE WILL HAVE A PRESIDENT WHO WE WILL HAVE A PRESIDENT WHO DOESN’T HAVE A CHECK ON HIM. DOESN’T HAVE A CHECK ON HIM. WHEN WE DON’T CHECK HIM, HE WILL WHEN WE DON’T CHECK HIM, HE WILL ASSUME MORE AUTHORITY, MORE ASSUME MORE AUTHORITY, MORE POWER, AND HE WILL ASSUME THE POWER, AND HE WILL ASSUME THE POWER OF A MONARCH. POWER OF A MONARCH. WE DON’T WANT A MONARCHY. WE DON’T WANT A MONARCHY. WE WANT DEMOCRACY IN THE UNITED WE WANT DEMOCRACY IN THE UNITED STATES OF MANAGER. STATES OF MANAGER.>>I THINK THAT’S WELL PUT.>>I THINK THAT’S WELL PUT. TO DISTILL IT, EITHER YOU CHECK TO DISTILL IT, EITHER YOU CHECK THE PRESIDENT OR CONGRESS HE THE PRESIDENT OR CONGRESS HE KNOWS UP CHECKING ITSELF. KNOWS UP CHECKING ITSELF. STAY WITH ME. STAY WITH ME. I WANT TO BRING IN A TRANSITION I WANT TO BRING IN A TRANSITION STAFFER WHO QUIT OVER SOME STAFFER WHO QUIT OVER SOME POLICY DIFFERENCES AND NOW IS POLICY DIFFERENCES AND NOW IS ALSO CALLING FOR IMPEACHMENT. ALSO CALLING FOR IMPEACHMENT. I DON’T THINK IT IS EVERY DAY I DON’T THINK IT IS EVERY DAY THAT SOMEONE IN YOUR POSITION THAT SOMEONE IN YOUR POSITION AND CONGRESSMAN GREEN’S POSITION AND CONGRESSMAN GREEN’S POSITION WOULD BE EXACTLY ON THE SAME WOULD BE EXACTLY ON THE SAME PAGE BUT IT IS THE TRUMP ERA. PAGE BUT IT IS THE TRUMP ERA. EXPLAIN HOW YOU GOT HERE. EXPLAIN HOW YOU GOT HERE.>>YEAH.>>YEAH. IN FACT I TESTIFIED IN FRONT OF IN FACT I TESTIFIED IN FRONT OF RECOMMENDIVE GREEN AND WE DON’T RECOMMENDIVE GREEN AND WE DON’T OFTEN AGREE. OFTEN AGREE. I GOT HERE BECAUSE I READ THE I GOT HERE BECAUSE I READ THE MUELLER REPORT OF THE IT IS MUELLER REPORT OF THE IT IS CLEAR THE PRESIDENT ENGAGED IN CLEAR THE PRESIDENT ENGAGED IN OBSTRUCTION, UP TO 12 COUNTS AND OBSTRUCTION, UP TO 12 COUNTS AND WAS POSSIBLY EVEN SUCCESSFUL IN WAS POSSIBLY EVEN SUCCESSFUL IN HIDING THE TRUTHFUL THERE ARE HIDING THE TRUTHFUL THERE ARE STILL MESSAGES, WHAT’S APP STILL MESSAGES, WHAT’S APP MESSAGES WE HAVEN’T SEEN BECAUSE MESSAGES WE HAVEN’T SEEN BECAUSE THEY’VE BEEN DELETE. THEY’VE BEEN DELETE. AND I GOT HERE. AND I GOT HERE. IT’S CLEAR TO ME, THE EMPEROR IT’S CLEAR TO ME, THE EMPEROR HAS NO CLOTHES. HAS NO CLOTHES. LET’S PUT IT THAT WAY. LET’S PUT IT THAT WAY. AND IT IS SURPRISING TO ME I AND IT IS SURPRISING TO ME I DON’T HAVE MORE OF MY FORMER DON’T HAVE MORE OF MY FORMER COLLEAGUES IN THE REPUBLICAN COLLEAGUES IN THE REPUBLICAN CAUCUS ON THE HIM SPEAKING OUT. CAUCUS ON THE HIM SPEAKING OUT. HOPE ANY MORE WILL COME LANGUAGE HOPE ANY MORE WILL COME LANGUAGE BUT I THINK WE NED MORE BUT I THINK WE NED MORE LEADERSHIP AS WELL. LEADERSHIP AS WELL. IT’S TIME FOR IMPEACHMENT. IT’S TIME FOR IMPEACHMENT.>>MAY I RESPOND?>>MAY I RESPOND?>>GO AHEAD, YES.>>GO AHEAD, YES. I CONCUR. I CONCUR. I THINK HE IS IMEMINENTLY CORREC I THINK HE IS IMEMINENTLY CORREC THAT WAS PARTY LINES IN THE THAT WAS PARTY LINES IN THE SENATE AND A HANDFUL OF SENATE AND A HANDFUL OF DEMOCRATS IN THE HOUSE. DEMOCRATS IN THE HOUSE. THOSE WHO WANT THIS TO BECOME A THOSE WHO WANT THIS TO BECOME A WALK IN THE PARK ARE SADLY WALK IN THE PARK ARE SADLY MISTAKEN. MISTAKEN. THE FRAMERS OF THE CONSTITUTION THE FRAMERS OF THE CONSTITUTION INDICATED THAT IT WOULD NOT BE INDICATED THAT IT WOULD NOT BE SOMETHING THAT WOULD BE EASY TO SOMETHING THAT WOULD BE EASY TO DO. DO. BUT THAT’S WHY WE HAVE THE JOBS. BUT THAT’S WHY WE HAVE THE JOBS. BECAUSE WE DO THE DIFFICULT BECAUSE WE DO THE DIFFICULT THINGS. THINGS. IT IS GOING TO BE DIVISIVE. IT IS GOING TO BE DIVISIVE. THAT’S UNDERSTANDABLE OF BUT THAT’S UNDERSTANDABLE OF BUT THIS CONSTITUTION, THIS COUNTRY THIS CONSTITUTION, THIS COUNTRY CAN SURVIVE IMPEACHMENT. CAN SURVIVE IMPEACHMENT. WE SURVIVED WITH IT CLINTON. WE SURVIVED WITH IT CLINTON. WE SURVIVED WITH IT ANDREW WE SURVIVED WITH IT ANDREW JOHNSON. JOHNSON. AND IF WE DON’T DO IT, THE AND IF WE DON’T DO IT, THE CONGRESS WILL BECOME A TOOTHLESS CONGRESS WILL BECOME A TOOTHLESS PAPER TIGER FOR THOSE WHO DON’T PAPER TIGER FOR THOSE WHO DON’T UNDERSTAND THE PROCESS, THE UNDERSTAND THE PROCESS, THE COURT, WHERE THE PRESIDENT WILL COURT, WHERE THE PRESIDENT WILL BE TRIED, IS THE SENATE WITH THE BE TRIED, IS THE SENATE WITH THE CHIEF JUSTICE PRESIDING. CHIEF JUSTICE PRESIDING. THE CHIEF JUSTICE. THE CHIEF JUSTICE. ALL OF THESE SUBPOENAS THAT WE ALL OF THESE SUBPOENAS THAT WE WANT, WE CAN GET THEM THROUGH WANT, WE CAN GET THEM THROUGH CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS. CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS. WE WILL HAVE A TRIAL THERE. WE WILL HAVE A TRIAL THERE. THERE WILL BE PROSECUTORS FROM THERE WILL BE PROSECUTORS FROM THE HOUSE CALLED MANAGERS AND THE HOUSE CALLED MANAGERS AND THEY CAN GET ALL OF THIS THEY CAN GET ALL OF THIS EVIDENCE. EVIDENCE. THAT COURT IS AN INFERIOR COURT THAT COURT IS AN INFERIOR COURT WHEN IT COMES TO THE QUESTION OF WHEN IT COMES TO THE QUESTION OF IMPEACHMENT. IMPEACHMENT.>>I’M ONLY INTERJECTED.>>I’M ONLY INTERJECTED. ESSENTIAL I INVITED JW ON, I ESSENTIAL I INVITED JW ON, I WANT TO GET HIM ON ONE MORE WANT TO GET HIM ON ONE MORE TIME. TIME. THE PRESIDENT CLEARLY HAS THE PRESIDENT CLEARLY HAS DECIDED THAT MAXIMUM STONE DECIDED THAT MAXIMUM STONE WALLING AND MAXIMUM IMPACT IS WALLING AND MAXIMUM IMPACT IS HIS WAY FORWARD. HIS WAY FORWARD. BASED ON YOUR UNIQUE KNOWLEDGE, BASED ON YOUR UNIQUE KNOWLEDGE, DO YOU THINK ANYTHING WILL MOVE DO YOU THINK ANYTHING WILL MOVE HIM? HIM? OR DOES HE LOOK AT A WEAK LIKE OR DOES HE LOOK AT A WEAK LIKE THIS POLITICALLY AS EXACTLY WHAT THIS POLITICALLY AS EXACTLY WHAT HE WANTED? HE WANTED?>>THAT I THINK THE NEXT SHOE TO>>THAT I THINK THE NEXT SHOE TO DROP WILL BE MAXINE WATERS’ DROP WILL BE MAXINE WATERS’ INVESTIGATION OF THE DEUTSCHE INVESTIGATION OF THE DEUTSCHE BANK DOCUMENTS. BANK DOCUMENTS. SHE’S ALREADY WON AT THE SHE’S ALREADY WON AT THE DISTRICT COURT LEVEL. DISTRICT COURT LEVEL. HAVING BEEN SOMEONE WHO WROTE HAVING BEEN SOMEONE WHO WROTE SUBPOENAS FOR THE COMMITTEE, FOR SUBPOENAS FOR THE COMMITTEE, FOR THE REPUBLICAN CHAIRMAN WHO THE REPUBLICAN CHAIRMAN WHO PRECEDED HER, THEY’RE SQUARELY PRECEDED HER, THEY’RE SQUARELY IN THEIR RIGHTS TO GET DOCUMENTS IN THEIR RIGHTS TO GET DOCUMENTS AND THAT WILL BE THE NEXT SHOE AND THAT WILL BE THE NEXT SHOE TO DROP. TO DROP. THAT SPEAKS TO FRANKLY, VERY THAT SPEAKS TO FRANKLY, VERY DIRECTLY, THE MUELLER REPORT. DIRECTLY, THE MUELLER REPORT. REMEMBER ONE REASON HE WAS REMEMBER ONE REASON HE WAS DANGING PARDONS IN FRONT OF DANGING PARDONS IN FRONT OF MICHAEL COHEN WAS TO STOP COHEN MICHAEL COHEN WAS TO STOP COHEN FROM REVEALING PREVIOUS FROM REVEALING PREVIOUS INSTANCES OF BANK FRAUD AND WHO

Only registered users can comment.

  1. Dems better start Impeachment hearings, otherwise theyre just as complicit as the rotten Republicans! I'm a Dem who helped them win back the House with my vote, now my patience wears thin!!

  2. The US Constitution mandates impeachment, aside from political considerations. Do it already! Let the chips fall where they may, but the safety of the democracy is at hand . Quite frankly: "Knowing that there was Russian interference in favor of Trump, he should have never been seated as the president to begin with"!

  3. Seems the Republicans put all their money on Trump to have their party turn into a Trump Enterprise .

  4. Mueller should testify! If for no other reason than, after more than two years, we should know what his voice sounds like.

  5. These people keep saying Trump has to be removed–but impeachment would certainly lead to acquittal by the GOP Senate–the fact that an election is around the corner makes that certain.

  6. I see I have run up against the Democrat ship of fools. Who Have no clue what impeachment is,beside a cool sounding word that kills Presidents It never killed a President!Nixon Retired, the Republicans went after him. This is not that Party.Has anybody named the 19 Republican Senators who will vote with us?Do you even Know why ask that?You are following Fox News Left

  7. The biggest thing Fox left is not telling you is the Severity, which this party will suffer.Be carefull, they Know we cant win, Why are they pushing it?I am not trying to convince,you show your stupidity( not ignorance, you could find out everything yourself).You would no they dont even have 1/2 of the House- Frauds- 31 of 48 Dem Senators,they wont do it

  8. The republicans in the senate are the problem. They refused to even interview Merrick Garland for his seat in the supreme court, and they will never vote to impeach Trump. That's why Pelosi is so hesitant to go through with impeachment; it's pointless because of corrupt republican senators.

  9. Trump his a deferent type of terrorist, He is destroying the American way of life, profiling of the hard working people and ruining them……..

  10. They need to start impeachment proceedings IMMEDIATELY. And if Senate is against impeachment, then ALL of America will know that they are not trustworthy if they condone trumps breaking the law. THAT will insure we don't HAVE anymore racist republicans for president for many years to come. Because it's WE THE PEOPLE that will be doing the voting, and turning away from those candidates who only serve themselves instead of the American people

  11. I don't think they should impeach Donald. I think they should shoot him for treason. The Mueller report has it very clear that why no collusion actually happened that's not for lack of trying on trumps part. the only reason he got away with it was because he was to stupid and the people in his administration just refused to listen to him and break the law. Trump is like an incompetent bank robber who told everyone he was going to rob a bank became ceo of that bank then told all the employees give me all the money and when they refused he fired them, and then an investigation said well he tried to rob the bank but he didn't so no crime done.

  12. Impeach the fat SOB already. When there's a dangerous criminal running around loose, you act with immediacy.

  13. Impeach him for what? Where is the evidence? You already have thrown the towel in for 20/20? You lost get over it. Back Bernie and you still have a good chance in the next election. Impeach a president over lies and your delusional dreams of crybullying Hillary into power would just result in the vice president taking over anyways. You dont' just make up new rules. What about Hillary stealing nomination from Bernie? The media is lying to you. Your hate has made you blind. Yes, something is afoot Trump is trying to push 5G and is not backing Assange. Any moderates would go as far as Bernie but to trust the far left no way. Mueller won't testify in public because he knows the truth will come out eventually. Not the current media's truth: weaponized russian spy beluga whale escapes from military training facility?????? I see a tame white beluga whale wearing an old harness begging for fish from fisherman and I it didn't take long to find news reports, less than a month earlier, when a russian firm was ordered to release dozens of beluga whales held in poor conditions that were going to be sold to Chna zoos. After pressuring the Kremlin who were concerned the whales may no longer be able to survive anymore in wild, they ordered them released as there was more of an outcry. Now everyone pretends like it didn't happen and stays silent when the media accuses the Russians of training and weaponizing beluga whales as spies when a tame beluga turns up 3 weeks later looking for a hand out? Hindsight is 20/20.

  14. It's not a case of Trump wanting to be impeached. It is Pelosi being too gutless to impeach. All she wants to do is talk, and play politics.

  15. Disdain and disappointment of the Democrats has transcended the disgust and disgrace of Trump and the Republicans. The Republicans have enabled Trump through their submissive sycophancy, and so have Democrats by inaction. Pelosi is not an effective leader for these conditions.

  16. His father is Palestinian and his mother is Syrian descent. Oh, you thought he was a dedicated public servant out for justice? Whatever, dude. Amash was a consultant to Michigan Industrial Tools Inc. (also known as Tekton Inc.), a company his father founded and owned.[9] He worked as a corporate attorney for his family's business for a year before being elected to the Michigan House of Representatives in 2008.[10][11] Amash's two brothers also have positions at Michigan Industrial Tools, and the three share ownership of Dynamic Source International, a Chinese company that is a supplier to Michigan Industrial Tools.[8][12]

  17. Mueller needs to come forward and talk about his report. We don't want a Barr version. He fought for the country once he needs to do it again.

  18. I wonder what cover-up Nancy Peloci is talking about. She has not defined what Trump has ":covered-up":. Surely to find out what Trump has covered-up it is important to have transparency, and declassification of all related documents to the Russian collusion narrative. Why hide behind classification. Is there something amiss? Has the CIA and FBI done anything illegal? It does not seem too far fetched an idea to me, after all they are an intelligence agency and who knows what kind of nefarious activities they have been up to all these years. The CIA has not had a very good reputation since the assassination of John F Kennedy as rumors have been circulating that they were the master minds behind his assassination. They have been getting away with misdeeds for far too long. It's high time they get investigated. Its good that the American public discover what they have been up to and how they have been involved in fabricating this Russian collusion story, if they had been behind it. If they are clear and clean – they will be exonerated, so what's the fear.

  19. Putin wants Barr to uncover the name of our asset inside the Kremlin. What do you think Trump and his boss talked about for 2 hrs (No Americans listening again)? Why can't WE see what Putin will get to see?

  20. It's time America…..please phone your reps to let them know. The Dems are notorious for being spineless, I'm ready and let the chips fall where they may.

  21. pelosi's fear is the weakest link. Clinton was NOT re elected AFTER partial impeachment; his second term was almost up. She fears the GOP will use it to get the sympathy votes?
    green was right 2 yrs ago. trump remarks on stopping comey to tv /obstruction was enough to impeach

  22. If you had anything you would impeach. If you have nothing you will continue to bellyache about it. Next vid…

  23. Trump asks can i imagine him being impeached. Oh, yes, Donald, yes, I can! Most of America can! What's more, it won't have to be a thing imagined for much longer. Lawyer up, moron!

  24. Wow, Green is great!!! This was over all one of the clearest accounts of why impeachment MUST start immediately. Good work!

  25. To impeach or not to impeach that is the question . Whether tis nobler in the mind to suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous misfortune ,or to take arms against your sea of troubles and by opposing end them.

  26. trump said he wanted to rasberry danish my mom and when i explained what i didnt know what that meant he drew this picture and said i should be there holding his coat downstairs while he does the deed .. im trying to keep a brave face but its down right scary

  27. Impeach Pelosi first to take her out of the way, so the congress is going to be able to impeach the orangutan the criminal in chief.

  28. "Intervention" is the wrong "i-word" for Nancy to say regarding Trump AND Pence. As more info comes out, Pence will be found to be deep in the doodoo of the Trump Crime Organization.

  29. I believe that the president wants to be the dictator for life and wants his kids to follow him into power. I think they need to be stopped now.

  30. Christina said a mouthful in her opening statement. The trump regime is consolidating power and must be stopped.

  31. Trump has been impeachable since January 2017. Let's listen to what Mueller has to say and get to it… Trump is a criminal, how long will we look the other way?

  32. will GOP survive this disaster? I am an independent, voted for republicans many times before but can't imagine doing it ever again.

  33. Dems are SO weak. It’s why they lost in 2016. And now? They’re afraid people won’t vote for them if they they impeach. People won’t for them if they DON’T impeach. ‘Believe me.’

  34. Good to see the people are not dignifying him and his antics by using his name in their posts.

  35. Rev Al green speaks truth ….that the government is broken is you don't impeach …but all know that the sycophantic republicans will vote against it , which might well be used by those same republicans as a argument to help them in the next election…. It is hard to compete when you are completing against people who only interest is there own interest as opposed to the interests of the country 🙁

  36. Please stop saying if it is time to impeach the president.
    It was time to impeach him after a year and a half in office and he is still in after all the things that have happened.
    So clearly, he is not gonna be impeached because the government is too corrupt to do anything about it.

  37. monarchy!!! get your head out of the sand, you are all idiots, he wants to be a dictator, do you not see who he is friends with, he should be shot for treason. He was put in the white house by putin, to do as putin wants him to do,in return he got lots and lots of money and promised he would be in power, solely and forever. putin has done this in austria, tried in austrailia, canada, britain, italy, france …..we are in the middle of a world coup by putin and you all are still playing games.

  38. This is more complicated than just impeaching Trump. At some point they have to look at his political machine as a criminal enterprise and subject to sweeping RICO charges across the board. Mike Pence has broken and dishonored his oath as have those others who have abetted his agenda of lies, nepotism, obstruction, betrayal, and plunder or knew and remained silent.
    Lets see the succession.:
    VP
    Speaker of the house.
    That is why every step has to be correct to the letter of the law and honorable standards of the house and it's legal precedents.
    President Pelosi sounds pretty good for the next year.

  39. We the people have decided to hold the president accountable for his actions. Any other citizens would have been in jail by now

  40. When you thumb your nose at the people's house, you thumb your nose at the people. Whether you like the representative"s decision or not, whether you are a Democrat or a Republican YOU MUST COME TO CONGRESS WHEN THEY TELL YOU TO APPEAR BECAUSE THE HOUSE REPRESENTS THE PEOPLE.
    When you thumb your nose at the people's house, you thumb your nose at the people.

  41. #FASCISTFEDERALISTSOCIETY judges intend their families take more than just our deficit and 90+% of the wealth.

  42. DEMs by impeaching Trump in the house, you will expose Senate GOP's complicity in protecting Trump. Let the public know all the facts & let the patriotic citizens decide 2020. I am certain patriotic majority will throw Trump + GOP out!

  43. Every single democrat tripped while trying to outrun the tism'…

    Your hurt feelings aren't a impeachable offense… Your tears are delicious though.

  44. Trump has successfully eliminated the Constitution… he is now King, and Trump jr. is next in line for the throne.

  45. The impeachment is only the setup. They'll be able to run out the clock, and just like in Clinton's case, he won't be convicted. But the SDNY is another matter. They deal with financial malfeasances and no one is above the law. No one gets away with anything. Trump Foundation, Trump University, frauds designed to launder Russian and Saudi money. Watch, it's FAR from over for Trump.

  46. A lot of peoples lives have been hurt by trump ! Its only a question of who is really going to act to end this shithole Whitehouse !

  47. Liberals want to impeach Trump before AG Barr uncovers the deep state actors. These actors will be indicted soon.

  48. Take down this traiter ! Our democracy is in graet danger from a proven criminal con man ! His very history has poot him agains the law and people, and now the hole of our land and world may suffer! A DICTATOR in the maken !!! 😔🇺🇸

  49. Trump is not law abiding as a citizen nor as The President of The United and will face The Nation for doing his dirty deeds !!! So whither we impeach him or vote him out of office, he will be held accountable!!!

  50. Do it now!!! Impeachment inquiry. Set him up to lose 2020 so he and his family can go to jail. Impeachment could lead to a pardon from pence

  51. Can we indite a sitting Congress person? Why are we not holding more people accountable that are defending Trump??

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *