Freedom of Speech: Crash Course Government and Politics #25
Articles Blog

Freedom of Speech: Crash Course Government and Politics #25

October 20, 2019


Hi, I’m Craig, and this is Crash Course Government
and Politics, and today, we’re talking about free speech. Other Craig: Finally, today we can let loose
and establish the kinds of things we can say to criticize our government, like the crazy
idea that money and speech are the same thing. Other Other Craig: Not so fast, Clone, the
Supreme Court has ruled that spending money, at least in the political context, is speech.
You do have the right to criticize that decision though. Unless your boss or YouTube says that
you can’t. Craig: All right, we’re trying to talk about
free speech, shut up. Let’s get started and see if we can figure out what the limits of
free speech are, assuming that there are some. Other Other Craig: There aren’t. Craig: That’s a lie. But I’m free to say that. [Theme Music] Craig: There are two really important things
to remember about the First Amendment protection of free speech. The primary reason we have
freedom of speech is to allow for public criticism of the stupid government. Stupid government.
That’s the sort of thing that can land you in jail in countries that don’t have strong
free speech protections, or should I say, you would be Putin jail, heh, don’t put me
in jail. Oh, that’s right, I’m in the US, it doesn’t matter. The stories of oversensitive kings and dictators
silencing people who question their rule or even make jokes at their expense are too numerous
to recount, but for the most part, that kinda thing doesn’t happen in the US, which is why
no one gets arrested for carrying around a giant picture of Obama as Hitler, or former
President Bush as a monkey. Well, that’s stuff’s okay, as far as the First Amendment is concerned,
but that doesn’t mean it’s respectful or in good taste. The second thing to remember is
that the First Amendment protects you from the government doing things that try to deny
your speech, but not anyone else. What this means is that you don’t have an absolute right
to say whatever you want, wherever you want, to whomever you want and not suffer any
consequences. Isn’t that right, Stan, you dingus? I’m fired?
I was just kidding; it was a joke. If you work for a private company, your boss
can certainly fire you for saying mean things about them or revealing company secrets, and you
don’t have any First Amendment claim against them. Unless, of course, your boss is the government,
or a branch of the government, in which case, you might be able to claim a First Amendment
right. See, like most things, it’s complicated. Among the speech that is protected, not all
of it has the same level of protection under the First Amendment. Now, let’s exercise our
right to free Thought Bubble. The speech that gets the strongest protection is political
speech. Criticism of, but also praise for particular officials, their parties, or their
policies is usually protected. It’s given what is called preferred position, which means
that any law or regulation or executive act that limits political speech is almost always
struck down by courts. The big case that made pretty much the final decision on political
speech was Brandenburg v. Ohio in 1968. In this case, a Ku Klux Klan leader was making
a speech that, as you can imagine, was offensive to a lot of people and could have been considered
threatening, too. The court ruled that because the speech was political, it was protected
by the First Amendment, no matter how outrageous it was. The court said, “The Constitutional
guarantees of free speech and free press do not permit a state to forbid or proscribe
advocacy of the use of force or law violation except where such advocacy is directed to
inciting or producing imminent action and is likely to produce such action.” According
to the court, the First Amendment protects speech even if it advocates the use of force
or encourages people to violate the law. So you can advocate overthrowing the government
or not paying your taxes as much as you want, unless what you say is likely to produce the
thing you’re advocating. Overthrowing the government, say. And it is likely to happen
imminently, meaning very soon after you make the statement. This case limited an older
standard regarding free speech that was put forward in the case US v. Schenck in 1917.
In that case, Schenck distributed pamphlets urging people to avoid the draft for World
War I. This was a violation of the Espionage Act, which made it a crime to obstruct the
draft or the war effort. The law was more complicated than that, but that’s the basic
gist. In his decision on this case, Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote that, “When that speech
presents a clear and present danger, the state can then abridge that person’s speech.” Memorably,
he explained that the First Amendment does not protect a person who shouts “fire” in
a crowded theater. In later cases, Holmes limited this idea, largely because it gives
the government a lot of leeway to say what kind of speech creates danger, especially
during a war, as was the case with Schenck. Thanks, Thought Bubble. Political speech isn’t the only type of speech
that the courts have addressed. Symbolic speech can also be protected by the First Amendment,
and if that symbolic speech has political content, it usually is protected. Symbolic
speech includes wearing armbands, carrying signs, or even wearing a jacket with an obscene
word directed at the military draft. Symbolic speech also includes burning an American flag,
which pretty much is always a political message. Not all symbolic speech is protected, though.
For example, if you’re a high school student who holds up a banner that reads, “Bong hits
4 Jesus” at a school-sponsored function, don’t expect that the First Amendment will prevent
the school, a government agent, from suspending you. And yes, that really happened. Also,
this is not symbolic speech. That’s violence. Even hate speech is protected. Even if it’s
really hateful, like burning a cross on a person’s lawn, although this might be prosecuted
as vandalism or trespassing. Public universities that try to punish hate speech have seen their
discipline code struck down. Commercial speech might not be protected, but if it’s a political
commercial, it will be, and as we’ve pointed out before, spending money on political campaigns
has been determined to be speech that is protected by the First Amendment, although we shall
see donations to political campaigns are still treated differently, at least for now. Pretty much the only kind of speech that’s
not protected, other than speech that’s likely to incite immediate violence, is what’s called
fightin’ words. In the actual case that dealt with fighting words, Chaplinsky v New Hampshire,
the defendant uttered what seemed more like insults than a call to engage in fisticuffs.
What’d you call me? Still, the court ruled that some words were so insulting that they
were more than likely to result in a fight, so fighting words are not protected speech.
One thing to note, though, the fighting words free speech exception is almost never used. So as you can see, the First Amendment pretty
much protects you from the government throwing you in jail or otherwise punishing you for
what you say in most instances, but it’s important to remember than the First Amendment is not
unlimited. Most important, it only protects you from government action, not the action
of private people, especially your employers. One final example might make this clear. In
Pickering v. Board of Education, a public school teacher wrote a letter to the editor
of his local paper complaining about the way that the school board was spending money on
the schools. He didn’t write it on school time or using school paper or email, especially
since it was 1968 and there was no email. The school board, or his principal, fired
him. He brought the case to the Supreme Court, claiming that he was fired for his speech,
which was political in nature criticizing local government and not for anything related
to his job performance, and he won. But the only reason he was able to get his job back
is that his employer was the government, so it was the government that punished him for
speaking out. For most of us, complaining about our employer’s policies may get us fired,
and unless we are government employees, we can’t claim that it violated our First Amendment
rights. The First Amendment, like all of the Amendments, is meant to protect us from an
overreaching government. There are other types of laws that help us deal with individuals
who do things that we think are wrong, but we’ll talk about those in another episode. Thanks for watching. See ya next time. Mmmph!
Third eagle punch in the video. Is that too much? It doesn’t matter. I’m free to do it.
Crash Course Government and Politics is produced in association with PBS Digital Studios. Support
for Crash Course US Government comes from Voqal. Voqal supports nonprofits that use
technology and media to advance social equity. Learn more about their mission and initiatives
at Voqal.org. Crash Course was made with the help of all of these free speakers. Thanks
for watching.

Only registered users can comment.

  1. OMAR AND TLAIB ARE HECKLERS who are inciting Congress to act to limit free speech.
    “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon “…you do what you can with what you have and clothe it with moral arguments"– Saul Alinsky, Rules for Radicals THEY ARE CAUSING CONGRESS TO LIMIT FREE SPEECH WHICH HURTS EVERYONE

  2. Had you heard that Canada is trying to enforce a law that states that anyone who says anything about Islam can be charged? That is violating humanity’s greatest right. That law should never become a thing.

  3. Yo so I got a question: Craig says that your boss can fire you if you bad mouth him or reveal company secrets, and you have no first amendment claim, unless your boss is part of the government, in which case you can make that argument. So why cant people like government whistleblowers (the example in my mind here is Snowden) just use this to their advantage instead of having to seek asylum or the like?

  4. Not quite correct. The Supreme Court has also ruled that you don't loose your constitutional rights by location. Your boss can fire you because you say bad things to him, but it has nothing to do with freedom of speech. Your talking about apples and oranges.

  5. So I'm confused does that mean a white supremacists or someone labeled a nazi is aloud his freedom to say what he wants neither it is racist or not?

  6. 0:58 "Or should I say you would be put in jail" Put in… Putin jail, hm "Don't put me in jail"
    Nice reference to Russia!

  7. Facebook is basically every fascist, communist, nazi, and brutal dictatorship rolled into a website

  8. Freedom of speech means you're free to say anything you want about any topic anytime freedom of speech means you are free to encourage the overthrow of the government if anyone can control what you say if anyone can edit what you say then you don't have freedom of speech. It doesn't matter if anyone likes what you're saying or not you can't limit what anyone says when the blacks are the Mexicans talk about wanting to kill off all white people no matter how disgusting that is you have to defend that it's a ku Klux Klan want to talk about killing off all blacks and Mexicans it doesn't matter if you like that thought or not you have to fight for their right to say it there's no such thing as hate speech or dangerous speech freedom of speech means anything you want to say any time including any council meeting you're free to say it

  9. Unfortunately people think the court has something to say about it we are not a government of courts we're not a government of politicians or parties were government of free citizens the citizens had already decided by the Constitution that everything is freedom of speech

  10. None of this applies if you're a British citizen that publishes embarrassing secrets on a website in Europe.

  11. Freedom of speech does not include freedom to offend, but includes freedom to express our worthless opinions.

  12. So the only ones not allowed to obstruct your free speech is the government? So why are people complaining about hate speech being censored on INSTAGRAM

  13. It doesn't protect you from the government. In the State capitol you're not allowed to talk about your past accomplishments, Current accomplishments or the Fact that you're a republican. That is considered Masculine toxicity. Don't ever say anything good about Trump either.

  14. Someone please explain why schools are allowed to limit free speech I think they should be able to but I don't understand why

  15. Free Speech, We will start from zero if you want, but we will get there peacefully, or destroy half of the world after monstrous atrocities due to ignorance and stupidity. You decide. Nobody can have it all.

  16. I had trouble with social media ever since I had a divorce from an abuser in 2012. The reason is I did not feel comfortable putting on my name exactly as it is, or my location because I was a victim of stalking.
    So, when I would hide this, they would ban me. But I had every good reason to hide it for my personal safety!

    I think this also needs addressing.

  17. Article 21 (JP Constitution) does not give those offended rights from being offended. Remember, if all speech were approved, it would not need protection.

  18. The problem is that Statistics and facts are considered hate speech by far left liberals today. The truth when spoken causes violence. All proven by the violent Berkeley riots to keep Ben Shapiro from speaking his statistics and facts… I just have to ask, wouldn't you rather know who the kkk is, than not know? If you silence all the haters, do you believe you get rid of all the hate? You don't, you just hide it. Then, how do you know who to trust. We will never really know our fellow human beings because we won't be able to talk honestly with each other.

  19. this video is so terrible i wanna pluck my own eyes out and squeeze them and make soup to throw on his stuuuupid face.

  20. We know at PBS you only get fired if you don't walk the leftist lie…. why our taxes are sent to this propaganda wing of the globalists is a mystery…

  21. We still got freedom of speech stop trying to live on your phones and realize whats going on in our country instead of our phones its not freedom of speech because internets is for the whole world not only america and america has freedom of speech so go protest in the streets for our country not our internet

  22. Hmm what do you do when private businesses (Google, Youtube, Twitter) become more powerful than the govt and they use their power to silence you?

  23. ABCDEFG, damn it! All over again? That's like when you die in a video game and have to start all the way over.

  24. So then ESPN bans me, and then eventually everyone bans me and I go 6 feet under for nobody at all not banning me.

  25. Employers, State and Federal do in fact threaten employees with termination for speech vaguely defined by labels like harassment, types of derogatory remarks, and many other words and phrases. The employer can fire anyone it wants for any or no reason including retaliation. And it is the fired employee's burden, being cut off from his income and now facing bills, mortgage and car loan, to find funds to hire a lawyer and fight an uphill legal battle against the government. What happened to our Federal laws protecting employees from getting fired for no reason? The government uses employment as leverage to threaten it's employees if they say anything the employer doesn't like.

  26. Why cant students hold up signs or say what we want? Its a goverment agency. Also Stan voilance isnt symbolic speech

  27. Regarding violation of freedom of speech; a trickling, calm, steady, Mountain Stream, can wash away your whole city if you dam it long enough. I am going to destroy your entire civilization; I am going to have it milled, people in the future won’t even be sure you ever existed.

  28. Freedom of speech doesn’t mean that you can insult your president or insult anyone else, but protect you from saying the truth.

  29. Last July 12 2018 at 11:09 P.M. I was taken from my home by five officers . no arrest , no warrant, no complaint, no 911 call from the premises or from anyone else. I live with him and he was there that night. I had gotten home from playing tennis around 9:30. cleaned up. put some fresh clothes on. it was quiet. dog was asleep. my father watching T.V. in living room and was in my room. i basically just rent the room use the bathroom and kitchen. Out of no where There is a fist pounding hard on the door and since I have been being harassed by my local police force over the last few yrs or so I knew exactly who it was. I began recording audio within about 5-10 seconds: got my dog on a leash. 4 out five officers didn't have there badges on. The recording is about 1 hour and 15 minutes long.If anyone wants to listen to it you can on my youtube channel. it is the last video I posted that you want to watch channel name is JeffreyPayne: and if any one could help me out after listening to audio as far as what kind of civil rights and liberties did break .I assume all kinds. when you hear it for yourself maybe somebody could tell me on channel in a comment. Thanks( any contingency attorneys out there)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *