Is showdown over Mueller report becoming a constitutional crisis?
Articles Blog

Is showdown over Mueller report becoming a constitutional crisis?

August 26, 2019


JUDY WOODRUFF: There is an escalating showdown
between the two ends of Pennsylvania Avenue, and both sides are digging in their heels. The chairman of the U.S. House Judiciary Committee
says it has today taken a grave and momentous step. Lisa Desjardins begins our coverage of the
mounting clash over access to the entire Mueller report. LISA DESJARDINS: Today, power moves in an
escalating fight between branches. REP. JERROLD NADLER (D-NY): The Judiciary Committee
will please come to order. LISA DESJARDINS: House Democrats called a
rare hearing, the first step toward holding the attorney general in contempt of Congress. Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler pointed to
refusals to testify or to hand over an unredacted Mueller report. REP. JERROLD NADLER: The Trump administration has
taken obstruction of Congress to new heights. LISA DESJARDINS: Simultaneously, the Trump
administration made its own statement. The Department of Justice sent Nadler a letter
saying the contempt vote was unnecessary and that the president is exerting protective
executive privilege over the documents Democrats want, meaning the agency will not turn them
over. That raised already heated temperatures at
the Capitol. REP. SHEILA JACKSON LEE (D-TX): I can only conclude
the president seeks to take a wrecking ball to the Constitution of the United States of
America. For the first time in the history of the United
States, a president is now exerting executive privilege over every aspect of life. REP. CEDRIC RICHMOND (D-LA): Unfortunately, we
have an administration that is choosing to have a temper tantrum that is designed to
accomplish one thing. And that one thing is to never let the real
facts of the Mueller report come to light. LISA DESJARDINS: Republicans charged that
Democrats are playing politics. REP. DOUG COLLINS (R-GA): What a cynical, mean-spirited,
counterproductive and irresponsible step it is. REP. MIKE JOHNSON (R-LA): Our Democrat colleagues
have weaponized our critical oversight abilities. LISA DESJARDINS: Republican Jim Sensenbrenner
said the attorney general cannot hand over all of the Mueller report because grand jury
testimony in particular must stay secret. REP. JAMES SENSENBRENNER (R-WI): I think it is
absolutely shocking that the majority of this committee is going to ask the chief law enforcement
officer of the United States to commit a crime. Shocking. LISA DESJARDINS: Democrats rejected the argument
as hyperbole. REP. MARY GAY SCANLON (D-PA): Nobody is asking
the attorney general to disobey the law. We’re asking the attorney general to obey
the law and produce the Mueller report and the supporting documentation. LISA DESJARDINS: At the White House, hard
pushback at the committee and Chairman Nadler. SARAH HUCKABEE SANDERS, White House Press
Secretary: The attorney general is protecting information, grand jury information, confidential
information that he cannot release. The fact that the chairman knows that and
continues to ignore it is absolutely absurd. LISA DESJARDINS: Charging contempt of Congress
is a power lawmakers have held since the 1700s, but it is rarely used against members of the
executive branch, and even more rarely against the attorney general. There was a sense of the stakes on both sides. REP. DAVID CICILLINE (D-RI): I think people should
recognize this is a deadly serious moment our democracy is being tested. The rule of law and our basic institutions
that have made our democracy the envy of the world are being tested. REP. STEVE CHABOT (R-OH): Our Democratic colleagues
seem to be on a mission. They’re determined to destroy Attorney General
Barr, or at least discredit him in the eyes of the American people. LISA DESJARDINS: The vote reflected the sentiments. REP. JERROLD NADLER: Those in favor respond by
saying aye. Aye. Opposed, no. LISA DESJARDINS: A party-line split, with
Democrats voting to charge the attorney general with contempt. That resolution now moves to the full House. JUDY WOODRUFF: This evening, it is being widely
reported that Republican-led Intelligence Committee has subpoenaed Donald Trump Jr. They intend to ask, reportedly, about his
meeting with a Russian lawyer at Trump Tower in New York in 2016 and efforts by the Trump
Organization to build a Trump high-rise in Moscow. And Lisa joins me now, along with our White
House correspondent, Yamiche Alcindor. Hello to both of you. So, from your perspective, Yamiche, what are
these power moves about that the White House is making? And what is their rationale for claiming executive
privilege? YAMICHE ALCINDOR: Well, this really comes
down to historic power plays between the White House and Congress, each using their constitutional
powers to really go head to head. So, on the White House’s side, the president
is saying that Democrats are bitter about the 2016 election, and, as a result, they’re
carrying out partisan attacks. Democrats, of course, say they’re just going
and doing oversight over the president, that he should be held accountable. When it comes to exerting executive privilege,
the White House has two rationales for this. The first is that they say the material that
Congress wants are actually illegal to release. They say that there are issues with law enforcement
sources, intelligence sources, and also grand jury material. The other thing that White House aides have
been telling me today, they — the White House wanted to exert executive privilege before
the hearing because they wanted to protect Attorney General Bill Barr. They say that it’s going to be harder for
him to be held in contempt if the president is exerting executive privilege. So this is really about the White House trying
to have Bill Barr’s back. JUDY WOODRUFF: And, Lisa, you’re talking to
everybody on the Hill. What are they saying? What are Democrats saying this is all about? And why do they reject the president’s claim
of executive privilege? LISA DESJARDINS: That’s so interesting about
protecting the attorney general, because Democrats believe that the president already waived
executive privilege here by allowing this testimony in the first place to Robert Mueller. They said that’s when he should have claimed
executive privilege, not now. So they say that that’s not an argument that
they can put stock in. They also say that this is about more than
what’s happening. Increasingly, Judy, I feel not just tension,
but a larger concern from Democrats. They see a potential erosion of checks and
balances. I talked to Representative Debbie Mucarsel-Powell
from Florida. She’s an immigrant from Ecuador. And she told me that she was thinking about
South American dictators and how one small kind of erosion in checks and balances can
hurt a democracy. JUDY WOODRUFF: Huh. And so back to you, Yamiche. Where does this go from here? And what is the White House saying about some
of the Democrats calling this a constitutional crisis? YAMICHE ALCINDOR: Well, the battle between
White House and Congress is just getting started. On the issue of contempt, the DOJ put out
a very strong statement today saying that Attorney General Bill Barr shouldn’t be bullied
into releasing information that he thinks is illegal. Then you’re moving on to the idea of executive
privilege. There’s this idea that there might be pushback
between Robert Mueller and Don McGahn, the former White House counsel, to testifying
before Congress. The White House is saying that’s separate
issues and that they haven’t made a determination whether or not they would allow that to go
forward. But I was talking to a White House source
today. That person said that the White House has
already told Don McGahn not to turn over any documents to Congress because of issues of
executive privilege. Then, of course, this idea, broadening it
out, Don Jr. being subpoenaed by the Republican-led Senate Intelligence Committee really goes
to the heart of this idea that Congress might now start having fights between the president’s
own party and his son. And then, lastly, this idea of constitutional
crisis, I put the question directly to Sarah Sanders today and said, what do you make of
the fact that there are people saying that the president’s edging the country closer
and closer to a constitutional crisis? She said Democrats are the ones overstepping
and that the president is on firm legal grounds here. So she’s backing up the president, as Democrats
are, of course, sounding the alarm. JUDY WOODRUFF: It’s two totally different
— completely opposite sets of arguments. LISA DESJARDINS: Right. JUDY WOODRUFF: So, Lisa, we see the Congress
moving closer to a full House vote on this question of contempt. Historically, does that mean the House is
likely to get what it wants? LISA DESJARDINS: It’s complicated, Judy. What ends up happening in these cases, as
I reported, executive branch contempt of Congress is very rare. We have seen a couple of cases in recent years,
one, White House counsel Harriet Miers under George W. Bush, and then Attorney General
Eric Holder under President Obama. In both of these those cases, Judy, it went
to court. The courts took a long time to decide and
it went through appeal after appeal. In the end, while the courts upheld the idea,
the concept of Congress having this power, the court did not want to enforce it. And the presidents at the time were basically
able to run out the clock. Those documents were obtained by Congress
in both cases, but generally not until a new president was elected. So running out the clock is very possible
here for President Trump. However, there’s something exceedingly rare
that some Democrats are talking about. They have a different power of contempt that
they’re not invoking now. It’s called an inherent contempt of Congress,
which means Congress itself can wedge — can assess fines. And, long ago, it used to actually imprison
people itself. Some Democrats are saying perhaps it’s time
for them to try and use that power, which has not been used since 1935. JUDY WOODRUFF: I was going to say that has
not been used for a very long time. LISA DESJARDINS: No. There used to be a House jail, of course,
no longer. JUDY WOODRUFF: All right. Well, it’s — it seems to me it couldn’t get
much more serious than it is now, but we’re watching. LISA DESJARDINS: That’s right. JUDY WOODRUFF: You and Yamiche, thank you,
both. Yamiche Alcindor, Lisa Desjardins, we thank
you.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *