Legality | Wikipedia audio article
Articles Blog

Legality | Wikipedia audio article

October 11, 2019

Legality can be defined as an act, agreement,
or contract that is consistent with the law or state of being lawful or unlawful in a
given jurisdiction. Legal principle that an accused may not be
prosecuted for an act that is not declared a crime in that jurisdiction is actually about
the Principle of legality which is part of the overall concept of legality.==Definitions==
Vicki Schultz states that we collectively have a shared knowledge about most concepts. How we interpret the reality of our actual
understanding of a concept manifests itself through the different individual narratives
that we tell about the origins and meanings of a particular concept. The difference in narratives, about the same
set of facts, is what divides us. An individual has the ability to frame, or
understand, something very differently than the next person. Evidence does not always lead to a clear attribution
of the specific cause or meaning of an issue – meanings are derived through narratives. Reality, and the facts that surround it, are
personally subjective and laden with assumptions based on clearly stated facts. Anna-Maria Marshall states, this shift in
framing happens because our perceptions depend “on new information and experiences;”
this very idea is the basis of Ewick and Sibley definition of legality – our everyday experiences
shape our understanding of the law. Ewik and Silbey define “legality” more broadly
as, those meanings, sources of authority, and cultural practices that are in some sense
legal although not necessarily approved or acknowledged by official law. The concept of legality the opportunity to
consider “how where and with what effect law is produced in and through commonplace social
interactions….How do our roles and statuses our relationships, our obligations, prerogatives
and responsibilities, our identities and our behavoiurs bear the imprint of law. In a paper on Normative Phenomena of Morality,
Ethics and Legality, legality is defined taking the state’s role in to account as, The system
of laws and regulations of right and wrong behavior that are enforceable by the state
(federal, state, or local governmental body in the U.S.) through the exercise of its policing
powers and judicial process, with the threat and use of penalties,
including its monopoly on the right to use physical violence.==Principle of legality==
The principle of legality is the legal ideal that requires all law to be clear, ascertainable
and non-retrospective. It requires decision makers to resolve disputes
by applying legal rules that have been declared beforehand, and not to alter the legal situation
retrospectively by discretionary departures from established law. It is closely related to legal formalism and
the rule of law and can be traced from the writings of Feuerbach, Dicey and Montesquieu. The principle has particular relevance in
criminal and administrative law. In criminal law it can be seen in the general
prohibition on the imposition of criminal sanctions for acts or omissions that were
not criminal at the time of their commission or omission. The principle is also thought to be violated
when the sanctions for a particular crime are increased with retrospective effect. In administrative law it can be seen in the
desire for state officials to be bound by and apply the law rather than acting upon
whim. As such advocates of the principle are normally
against discretionary powers. The principle can be varyingly expressed in
Latin phrases such as Nullum crimen, nulla poena sine praevia lege poenali (No crime
can be committed, nor punishment imposed without a pre-existing penal law), nulla poena sine
lege (no penalty without law) and nullum crimen sine lege (no crime without law). A law that violates the principle by retroactively
making actions illegal that were committed before the enactment of the law is called
an ex post facto law.==Other related concepts==
Rule of law provides for availability of rules, laws and legal mechanism to implement them. Principle of legality checks for availability
and quality of the laws. Legality checks for if certain behaviour is
according to law or not. concept of Legitimacy of law looks for fairness
or acceptability of fairness of process of implementation of law. quality of being legal and observance to the
law may pertain to lawfullness, i.e. being consistent to the law or it may get discussed
in principle of legality or may be discussed as legal legitimacy.===Legality of purpose===
In contract law, legality of purpose is required of every enforceable contract. One can not validate or enforce a contract
to do activity with unlawful purpose.===Constitutional legality===
The principle of legality can be affected in different ways by different constitutional
models. In the United States, laws may not violate
the stated provisions of the United States Constitution which includes a prohibition
on retrospective laws. In Britain under the doctrine of Parliamentary
sovereignty, the legislature can (in theory) pass such retrospective laws as it sees fit,
though article 7 of the European convention on human rights, which has legal force in
Britain, forbids conviction for a crime which was not illegal at the time it was committed. Article 7 has already had an effect in a number
of cases in the British courts. In contrast many written constitutions prohibit
the creation of retroactive (normally criminal) laws. However the possibility of statutes being
struck down creates its own problems. It is clearly more difficult to ascertain
what is a valid statute when any number of statutes may have constitutional question
marks hanging over them. When a statute is declared unconstitutional,
the actions of public authorities and private individuals which were legal under the invalidated
statute, are retrospectively tainted with illegality. Such a result could not occur under parliamentary
sovereignty (or at least not before Factortame) as a statute was law and its validity could
not be questioned in any court.==International law==
Legality, in its criminal aspect, is a principle of international human rights law, and is
incorporated into the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant
on Civil and Political Rights and the European Convention on Human Rights. However the imposition of penalties for offences
illegal under international law or criminal according to “the general principles of law
recognized by civilized nations” are normally excluded from its ambit. As such the trial and punishment for genocide,
war crimes and crimes against humanity does not breach international law. There is some debate about whether this is
really a true exception or not. Some people would argue that it is a derogation
or – perhaps somewhat more harshly – an infringement of the principle of legality. While others would argue that crimes such
as genocide are contrary to natural law and as such are always illegal and always have
been. Thus imposing punishment for them is always
legitimate. The exception and the natural law justification
for it can be seen as an attempt to justify the Nuremberg trials and the trial of Adolf
Eichmann, both of which were criticized for applying retrospective criminal sanctions. The territorial principle, generally confining
national jurisdiction to a nation’s borders, has been expanded to accommodate extraterritorial,
national interest. In criminal law, the principle of legality
assures the primacy of law in all criminal proceedings.==Bibliography==
Kelsen, Hans. General Theory of Law and State (Cambridge,
Massachusetts : Harvard University Press, c1945) (Cambridge, Massachusetts : Harvard
University Press, 1949) (New York : Russell & Russell, 1961) (New Brunswick, New Jersey
: Transaction Publishers, c2006). Kelsen, Hans. Principles of international law (New York
: Rinehart, 1952) (New York : Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1966) (Clark, New Jersey : Lawbook
Exchange, 2003). Slaughter, Anne-Marie. A new world order (Princeton : Princeton University
Press, c2004). Nye, Joseph S. Soft power (New York : Public
Affairs, c2004). de Sousa Santos, Boaventura and César A.
Rodríguez-Garavito, eds. Law and globalization from below : towards
a cosmopolitan legality (Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press, 2005)
Marsh, James L. Unjust legality : a critique of Habermas’s philosophy of law (Lanham : Rowman
& Littlefield Publishers, c2001). Sarat, Austin, et al., eds. The limits of law (Stanford : Stanford University
Press, 2005). Milano, Enrico. Unlawful territorial situations in international
law : reconciling effectiveness, legality and legitimacy (Leiden ; Boston : M. Nijhoff,
c2006). Ackerman, Bruce, ed. Bush v. Gore : the question
of legitimacy (New Haven : Yale University Press, c2002). Gabriel Hallevy A Modern Treatise on the Principle
of Legality in Criminal Law (Heidelberg : Springer-Heidelberg, c2010).==See also==
Analytical jurisprudence legal positivism
Sources of law Nullum crimen, nulla poena sine praevia lege
poenali Socialist Legality
Agent of Record==External links==
Legality, generally: Cornell LII “Jurisprudence”
Cornell LII “International law” YaleLS Avalon Project, “Documents in Law,
History & Diplomacy” (many original documents, fulltexts online, defining The State and Legality)
Legality in actual operation in International Law, examples:
International Court of Justice International Criminal Court
International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia
International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda International Tribunal for the Law of the
Sea European Court of Human Rights
Decisions of various international judicial and quasi-judicial bodies, including PCIJ,
CACJ, CAT, CEDAW etc. Legality in actual operation in national Constitutional
Law, examples: US Supreme Court
Conseil Constitutionnel, France Law Lords, UK
Supreme Court, UK (New

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *