MUELLER HEARING: House Judiciary Committee Part 1
Articles Blog

MUELLER HEARING: House Judiciary Committee Part 1

November 23, 2019

Only registered users can comment.

  1. All the investigators were Clinton campaign supporters AND they donated?!?
    How the hell did this even go forward.

  2. Democrats are idiots. Repeat 300 times its not gonna change anything! Its not enough evidence even if ot was 100%

  3. THANK YOU, THANK YOU, Democrats, for the $40 million dollar campaign contribution for the Trump re-election in 2020! I say, money well spent!

  4. Perhaps those who are ardent to attack the WH Staff and Potus and undermine operations of the Executive branch are actually Agents of a foreign adversary.

  5. No wonder Globalists want to legalise necrophilia, bestiality and are supporters of masturbation instead of procreation…they are constantly flogging a dead horse

  6. If the President spoke with Sessions alone, how did this get out? Did Sessions tell or was the office "bugged"? If Trump towers could be bugged, why not the Oval Office?

  7. WANTING something to happen IS NOT A CRIME, WANTING something to happen is NOT OBSTRUCTION, ranting about the unfairness of something is NOT A CRIME, even TELLING someone to do something illegal is NOT A CRIME if that person doesn't COMMIT that crime……this is such a load of crap!!

  8. 35:26 – 40:32 Robert "You managed to violate every principle in the most sacred of traditions about prosecutors not offering extra prosecutorial analysis of potential crimes that aren't charged" Mueller is now his title, alongside Robert "Baghdad has failed to disarm their weapons of mass destruction" Mueller.

  9. I love the IDIOTIC looks on Nadlers face when Collins gave his opening statement. What a little DOPE, pushing still more investigations after Muellers report said that THERE WAS NO COLLUSION – HELLO YOU LISTENING DEMOCRATS OR ARE YOUR EARS MISSING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


  11. Ah yes typical behavior of dems they can't talk about anything unless it is to lie and steal from the AMERICAN tax payer……….

  12. I think that the answers given around the 2:00:00 mark were very misunderstood by both the democrats and by the people watching. Mueller was asked if he could indict a president once he left office and the answer was yes, because that is the rule, he wasn’t specifically talking about trump more so just restating the rules. And when he was asked if this would be ethical, again, the same premise applies, he is taking about any president not specifically about trump

  13. This man is a disgrace or possibly has dementia and was used for his name only that took to big of a hit on this blunder to mean anything to anyone any more. I hope he watches this and realizes how much of a pawn he looks like and how he is perceived today.

  14. So what is this called! Scripted Projection Hollywood of clown actor School Hahahahaha! This is Pathetic

  15. What we need to learn, the most important lesson by the Mueller testimony is this is the type of career bureaucrat that will determine if you receive healthcare or not, and determine what healthcare you will receive or not receive. And if you don't believe me LOOK at the UK's public healthcare, from rationing, outright denying, and punishing BY arresting those who dare to reject a bureaucrat's decision by leaving the UK and getting treatment. The only difference is private healthcare is not yet illegal in the UK but only the wealthy, and political class can afford it, the middle class, working class are stuck with rationed healthcare. You won't have that option if the Dems have their way.

  16. Democrat voters are bunch of idiots if Democrat voters vote to increase taxes. What Business men and Business Women to do, close business send Democrat voters out off jobs let Democrat voters eat trash be in homeless kick them out off been hired. How idiots Democrat voters are to let Democrat Politicians washed brain with corruption worse leadership Democrat Politicians provided to fall for failure leadership Democrat Politicians think things are going to be great while in first place Democrat Politicians worse and disaster leadership massive homeless massive crime's massive poverties for Democrat voters still remains dummies can't open eyes to see Democrat Politicians ideas are bunches Garbage produced no success at all. Democrat voters gone be the victim after vote for increase taxes, how many times Democrat voters been victims by vote for increase taxes a lot but Democrat voters are too idiots to remember that. Democrat voters are too idiots and continue make the same mistake over and over. More Democrat voters vote for Democrat Politicians more poverties more poverties Democrat voters got but Democrat Politicians are getting richest and richest. But Democrat voters are too idiots to figure out that.

  17. J. Nadler and all of his cronies should be tried for High Treason against the United States of America. Tried,convicted and swiftly hanged because they've done NOTHING but damage to the integrity of our justice system.

  18. You are hearing something totally different than what I am hearing , why are things twisted on both sides millions of Americans have never done one single violation, not even a ticket, the office of presidency should never be held by an unethical person period. We all no trump lies, he's bully and had Russia help him when we had sanctions on them. That is not patriotic and he should be impeached. You felt the same way when Hillary was accused of unethical behavior. No more candidates who are shady period. This is all circus. Trump cannot move forward too much, I want him impeached and you should too!

  19. Well if Trump's impeached pence can pardon him, if Trump's us not impeached and the Dems win the election, he is going to prison, the FBI is pissed and going to tear trump up

  20. Ariel Sharon: "Every time we do something you tell me Americans will do this and will do that. I want to tell you something very clear, don't worry about American pressure on Israel, we, the Jewish people control America, and the Americans know it." And they will control the whole World, better you know your enemy.

  21. @ 10:20 Right after Nadler says "Will you raise your right hand please." It sounds like he says "Left hand,". and he nod's his head to the left. Code for 'This guys is losing it' or inside joke ?

  22. if a president can be convicted of anything after leaving office then why have the last 5 been convicted for their crimes for anything they did during their time as president?

  23. I listened to this while in traffic and was SHOCKED. I knew all along Mueller was a figurehead for Andrew Weissmann but damn, this was elder abuse by the Democrats who forced him to do this.

  24. They talked about Mueller than act the same hell the man 78 years old Lord you don't say the same look how dumbass chunk trump act like a 3 year old Trump don't even know where daddy was born at

  25. Nadler? Were you being a naughty boy? What did Epstein have on you? Were you nadling somebody you shouldn’t have been?…huhhhh🤔

  26. Why is it SO hard for these idiots to understand that, while Trump wasn't indicted under the Mueller investigation, he's still being investigated. Mueller didn't indict ONLY because he's a sitting president. Hopefully, once he's out of office, hey be indicted.

    I've read the report and most of the Republicans "questioning" Mueller, weren't actually questioning Mueller, they were testifying.

    Trump wouldn't even testify. After he's out of office, he won't have a choice.

    God, does Ohio breed all idiot politicians? Jim Jordan – what an ass. Sherrod Brown and Mike Dewine belong on the short bus.

  27. This sounds like a "Tribunal" not a "Hearing" held by the congress of the United States. What are We doing? We are allowing Our Congress to conduct a "Tribunal" against Our President!

  28. Everything the Right questions is a fact about the report. Everything the Left questions is an attack, an emotional evaluation. Mueller stumbles over the questions the Right asks and he substantials the the Left asks. He has been coached and is acting like he is "Out Of It". The Left keeps giving Mueller akolaids to build up their grounds to impeach the President. What are they trying to do? No question about what they are doing. This is just an ACT!

  29. Mueller found 10 acts of obstruction of justice by the president. Too bad that a sitting president cannot be indicted for that. Presidents can only be impeached. See Richard Nixon, who had to resign after the impeachment proceedings had started.

  30. Ha ha ha what a joke the USA is!! Complete time wasting by a complete incompetent , time wasting, senile, lying Wueller!! Nothing will be done it’s all for show!! Joke the USA is absolute joke !!!

  31. If Trump said he never wanted Mueller removed, then why do they say Trump wanted him fired.. Trump had nothing to hide, so he never said such a thing as having Mueller fired.. But we know Mueller had a lot to hide about himself and was really trying to cover his own butt..Democrats committed crime with other countries and against USA and that is why they want to remove Trump

  32. Notice he has answer when asked by the democrats but the when asked anything from the republicans he cannot answer them. Hmmmmm. Very typical and very shady. Even if Mueller was fired there would have been someone else would have took his place. The Dems are trying to make it look like the whole investigation would have been stopped. Who the F cares?! It's all the democrats on the team it would have only been right to have someone who wasn't a democrat leading it. It was all a one sided investigation from the beginning of this farce.

  33. He is a real dumb ass…is this how our govt people act? This is what our tax dollars pay for? Its time to get rid of the income tax!

  34. WHAT?!?! ARE YOU KIDDING??? DO THESE IDIOTS THINK WE ARE FALLING FOR THIS SHURT.DOES ANYONE ELSE SEE WHAT BS THIS ENTIRE THEATRICAL FARCE IS??? ObviouslyEVERY FRIGGIN NA__I UP THERE HAS BEEN READING NADLRS SCRIPT. EVER HEAR OF “LEADING THE WITNESS”. Ms Robi just tripped him into saying “we altered the report because …” OMG this should be called Nadlers puppets , You can HEAR that lil pos in every word coming out of each and every one of them. Mueller is CLUELESS about all of it. THIS IS AN INSULT TO OUR INTELLIGENCE. These people are STUPID. I FOR ONE AM SICK AND TIRED OF THESE OLD CRONEY SICK SOBs setting the expensive stage that we are paying for only to THINK THEY ARE PULLING IT OFF CUZ WE JUST STUPIC OUT HERE jn the real world. I MEAN PLEASE, TELL ME NO ONE ELSE IS EVEN SLIGHTLY FALLING FOR ANY MINUTE OF THIS Ndler SHOW. These are HIS WORDS AND NO ONE ELSES and I don’t even know any of them personally but I KNOW BS when I see it.

    Tell me why we aren’t suing these knuckleheads for all those wasted tax dollars just to cover A xitches crimes. funny how they will give up their reputations jobs, basically they will give anything up that jezeb__l tells them to…they mustve been bad and someone has the dirt on it ya think.

  35. Shut them down Shut them down. Undermining the USA, and the People . They R still after Wikileaks. Bet Snowden, & Manning.

  36. This is about …….but he can not answer question regarding the Validation which is all being projected to our Current President. What Horse S t! But more than willing and recalls answers every Democrat question. He his implicating himself on bias….

  37. Thank you Mr. Johnson, my sentiment exactly. Summary, No conflict of interest, or Bias? No Exact there there! But a TON of Money to be had milked from us the People, that screams Collusion!

  38. Destruction of Property that would impede obstruct investigation, pertaining to EVIDENCE, of one being Implicated, but No one is above the Law? We demand accountability! Which all emails support collusion!!!! But given ahead of time along with a long list given Immunity before they Testify ? Who in the history of this Hell has gone this and attempt Project obstruct Justice 2 our current President for Impeachment, they r Derranged! I would have fired Comey!

  39. So the second person to speak that defended Trump clearly states how Volume 2 of the report is about things that could have happened but there was no evidence to charge anyone and is primarily based on Mueller's interpretation of information. Volume 1 of the report is what the results of the evidence actually supported.
    If you notice, all the Democrats/ dipshits refer to Volume 2 for their questions as well as quotes and the Republicans refer to Volume 1 ( the facts) for their questions.
    Also, Mueller constantly has to check on the wording used in the report when answering the questions which makes it pretty obvious that (A) he did not write the majority of the report and (B) The report was written to word things in a way that did not give a straight answer and Mueller couldn't necessarily be charged with lying under oath. The majority of his answers he states that he would have to refer to the wording in the report.
    If this were a court hearing I would bet that ALL of Volume 2 of the report would be thrown out. You could basically object to every question that the Democrats asked.
    This is kind of ridiculous. What is also ridiculous is the amount of people who were fooled by this report and use it as their reasoning for calling for impeachment.

  40. As I have said before, if they were truly interested in the truth they would of have lying specialist, body language specialist and every one investigated hooked up to technology that can detect the truth from a person so you would have men and machine ,therefore there wouldn't be no questions asked as to who is telling the truth, at the same time saving a whole lot of money and time, but hey, am just saying, you know ….

  41. Why should we trust Mueller? He lied about weapons of mass destruction, and it is proven due to the possible meta data upload speeds of the time, that it was a leak, not a Russian hack, and besides, it is not Russia gate, it is Isreal Gate if you want to be specific. Cyber security back doors of our governments data is the more prominent riskto our nation…

  42. This report was nonsense. It appears the point was to get Trump instead of the truth. Then when they failed to get Trump, chapter 2 was written using news reports to destroy Trump’s reputation. Prosecutors don’t decide guilt or innocence, they prosecute. And their was no evidence of a crime. If there was, they would have went after Trump in full force. This report was an insult to everyone’s intelligence

  43. I bet all those that declared Chump's innocence of colluding with Russia look and feel really stupid, especially Ratcliff and Collins' big loud mouth and the rest of the Republikkklan sheeple Senators and Representatives. He tried to collude with the Ukrainian President to manufactor dirt on Biden just like he colluded with Russia to find dirt on Hillary Clinton. Mueller did what he was suppose to do. When a dog (Chump) is allowed to run loose without a leash he will get so comfortable, he start doing things he know he shouldn't. Like withholding aide from Ukraine unless dirt is manufactured on Biden and family to further his political career and chances to be re-elected. THIS is an IMPEACHABLE offense.

  44. So he's committed crimes or at least to conspire? Now Clinton was impeached because he had sex with someone who wasn't his wife. These are actual crimes against the democratic process, it's so much more than just voting

  45. We smell a skunk, we investigate and discover numerous skunks… and all the republicans do is try to cover up the stench with scented aerosol… party before country

  46. There Is No Escape from Justice our Lord and savior sees all things done in darkness and in light; judges all things with perfect resolve, Every Lie will be brought into the light, every deceit will be accounted for praise God as we wait on True Justice

  47. Mueller sticks to the report trying to mitigate his involvement in what clearly he understands could criminally implicate himself

  48. I like how all of the comments on this video at the time have around 90-95 likes. The Russian bots are out on this one. Mueller delivered a great performance. I would not be able to recall everything exactly as it was on a 400+ page report.

  49. The whistleblower ALLEGES in the complaint he is not the whistleblower / it's an hearsay allegation / So how does the law stand with gossip mongers ????? This evidence can not classed as been given by a whistleblower / or have whistleblower protection / This impeachment enquiry accuses a supposed crime of something that didn't happen even though all parties supposingly involved even the president of both countries involved in the allegations

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *