Supreme Court looking at protecting civil rights for transgender workers
Articles Blog

Supreme Court looking at protecting civil rights for transgender workers

October 15, 2019


BEING BEING INVESTIGATED. BEING INVESTIGATED.
WE BEING INVESTIGATED.
WE ARE BEING INVESTIGATED.
WE ARE LIVE BEING INVESTIGATED.
WE ARE LIVE IN BEING INVESTIGATED.
WE ARE LIVE IN CHANDLER. WE ARE LIVE IN CHANDLER. WE ARE LIVE IN CHANDLER.
MICHAEL WE ARE LIVE IN CHANDLER.
MICHAEL DOW. MICHAEL DOW. MICHAEL DOW.
12 MICHAEL DOW.
12 NEWS. 12 NEWS. 12 NEWS.
>>>12 NEWS.
>>>ANOTHER 12 NEWS.
>>>ANOTHER DEVELOPING 12 NEWS.
>>>ANOTHER DEVELOPING STORY>>>ANOTHER DEVELOPING STORY>>>ANOTHER DEVELOPING STORY
THIS>>>ANOTHER DEVELOPING STORY
THIS EVENING. THIS EVENING. THIS EVENING.
POTENTIAL THIS EVENING.
POTENTIAL LANDMARK THIS EVENING.
POTENTIAL LANDMARK CASES THIS EVENING.
POTENTIAL LANDMARK CASES AT THIS EVENING.
POTENTIAL LANDMARK CASES AT THE POTENTIAL LANDMARK CASES AT THE POTENTIAL LANDMARK CASES AT THE
U.S. POTENTIAL LANDMARK CASES AT THE
U.S. SUPREME POTENTIAL LANDMARK CASES AT THE
U.S. SUPREME COURT. U.S. SUPREME COURT. U.S. SUPREME COURT.
THESE U.S. SUPREME COURT.
THESE CASES U.S. SUPREME COURT.
THESE CASES COULD U.S. SUPREME COURT.
THESE CASES COULD CHANGE U.S. SUPREME COURT.
THESE CASES COULD CHANGE THE THESE CASES COULD CHANGE THE THESE CASES COULD CHANGE THE
LIVES THESE CASES COULD CHANGE THE
LIVES OF THESE CASES COULD CHANGE THE
LIVES OF TENS THESE CASES COULD CHANGE THE
LIVES OF TENS OF THESE CASES COULD CHANGE THE
LIVES OF TENS OF THOUSANDS THESE CASES COULD CHANGE THE
LIVES OF TENS OF THOUSANDS OF LIVES OF TENS OF THOUSANDS OF LIVES OF TENS OF THOUSANDS OF
PEOPLE LIVES OF TENS OF THOUSANDS OF
PEOPLE IN LIVES OF TENS OF THOUSANDS OF
PEOPLE IN ARIZONA LIVES OF TENS OF THOUSANDS OF
PEOPLE IN ARIZONA AND LIVES OF TENS OF THOUSANDS OF
PEOPLE IN ARIZONA AND MILLIONS PEOPLE IN ARIZONA AND MILLIONS PEOPLE IN ARIZONA AND MILLIONS
ACROSS PEOPLE IN ARIZONA AND MILLIONS
ACROSS THE PEOPLE IN ARIZONA AND MILLIONS
ACROSS THE COUNTRY. ACROSS THE COUNTRY. ACROSS THE COUNTRY.
>>ACROSS THE COUNTRY.
>>THE ACROSS THE COUNTRY.
>>THE QUESTION ACROSS THE COUNTRY.
>>THE QUESTION AT ACROSS THE COUNTRY.
>>THE QUESTION AT PLAY ACROSS THE COUNTRY.
>>THE QUESTION AT PLAY HERE ACROSS THE COUNTRY.
>>THE QUESTION AT PLAY HERE IS>>THE QUESTION AT PLAY HERE IS>>THE QUESTION AT PLAY HERE IS
BEING>>THE QUESTION AT PLAY HERE IS
BEING AN>>THE QUESTION AT PLAY HERE IS
BEING AN EMPLOYER>>THE QUESTION AT PLAY HERE IS
BEING AN EMPLOYER LEGALLY BEING AN EMPLOYER LEGALLY BEING AN EMPLOYER LEGALLY
DISCRIMINATE BEING AN EMPLOYER LEGALLY
DISCRIMINATE AGAINST BEING AN EMPLOYER LEGALLY
DISCRIMINATE AGAINST SOMEONE DISCRIMINATE AGAINST SOMEONE DISCRIMINATE AGAINST SOMEONE
BECAUSE DISCRIMINATE AGAINST SOMEONE
BECAUSE THEY DISCRIMINATE AGAINST SOMEONE
BECAUSE THEY ARE DISCRIMINATE AGAINST SOMEONE
BECAUSE THEY ARE GAY DISCRIMINATE AGAINST SOMEONE
BECAUSE THEY ARE GAY OR BECAUSE THEY ARE GAY OR BECAUSE THEY ARE GAY OR
TRANSGENDER? TRANSGENDER? TRANSGENDER?
>>TRANSGENDER?
>>GRAHAM TRANSGENDER?
>>GRAHAM RESTNICK TRANSGENDER?
>>GRAHAM RESTNICK SPOKE TRANSGENDER?
>>GRAHAM RESTNICK SPOKE TO TRANSGENDER?
>>GRAHAM RESTNICK SPOKE TO A>>GRAHAM RESTNICK SPOKE TO A>>GRAHAM RESTNICK SPOKE TO A
RESIDENT. RESIDENT. RESIDENT.
>>RESIDENT.
>>IT RESIDENT.
>>IT IS RESIDENT.
>>IT IS ILLEGAL RESIDENT.
>>IT IS ILLEGAL TO>>IT IS ILLEGAL TO>>IT IS ILLEGAL TO
DISCRIMINATE>>IT IS ILLEGAL TO
DISCRIMINATE AGAINST>>IT IS ILLEGAL TO
DISCRIMINATE AGAINST A>>IT IS ILLEGAL TO
DISCRIMINATE AGAINST A WOMAN>>IT IS ILLEGAL TO
DISCRIMINATE AGAINST A WOMAN AT DISCRIMINATE AGAINST A WOMAN AT DISCRIMINATE AGAINST A WOMAN AT
WORK DISCRIMINATE AGAINST A WOMAN AT
WORK BUT DISCRIMINATE AGAINST A WOMAN AT
WORK BUT NOT DISCRIMINATE AGAINST A WOMAN AT
WORK BUT NOT ILLEGAL DISCRIMINATE AGAINST A WOMAN AT
WORK BUT NOT ILLEGAL TO WORK BUT NOT ILLEGAL TO WORK BUT NOT ILLEGAL TO
DISCRIMINATE WORK BUT NOT ILLEGAL TO
DISCRIMINATE AGAINST WORK BUT NOT ILLEGAL TO
DISCRIMINATE AGAINST A DISCRIMINATE AGAINST A DISCRIMINATE AGAINST A
TRANSGENDER DISCRIMINATE AGAINST A
TRANSGENDER WOMAN DISCRIMINATE AGAINST A
TRANSGENDER WOMAN DOING DISCRIMINATE AGAINST A
TRANSGENDER WOMAN DOING THE TRANSGENDER WOMAN DOING THE TRANSGENDER WOMAN DOING THE
SAME TRANSGENDER WOMAN DOING THE
SAME THING. SAME THING. SAME THING.
TAXPAYER SAME THING.
TAXPAYER ADVOCATE SAME THING.
TAXPAYER ADVOCATE BREANNA SAME THING.
TAXPAYER ADVOCATE BREANNA WEST TAXPAYER ADVOCATE BREANNA WEST TAXPAYER ADVOCATE BREANNA WEST
BOOK TAXPAYER ADVOCATE BREANNA WEST
BOOK IS TAXPAYER ADVOCATE BREANNA WEST
BOOK IS SEEING TAXPAYER ADVOCATE BREANNA WEST
BOOK IS SEEING THAT TAXPAYER ADVOCATE BREANNA WEST
BOOK IS SEEING THAT AND TAXPAYER ADVOCATE BREANNA WEST
BOOK IS SEEING THAT AND SHE TAXPAYER ADVOCATE BREANNA WEST
BOOK IS SEEING THAT AND SHE CAN BOOK IS SEEING THAT AND SHE CAN BOOK IS SEEING THAT AND SHE CAN
FIND BOOK IS SEEING THAT AND SHE CAN
FIND A BOOK IS SEEING THAT AND SHE CAN
FIND A BUSINESS BOOK IS SEEING THAT AND SHE CAN
FIND A BUSINESS THAT BOOK IS SEEING THAT AND SHE CAN
FIND A BUSINESS THAT IS BOOK IS SEEING THAT AND SHE CAN
FIND A BUSINESS THAT IS STARVED FIND A BUSINESS THAT IS STARVED FIND A BUSINESS THAT IS STARVED
FOR FIND A BUSINESS THAT IS STARVED
FOR WORKERS. FOR WORKERS. FOR WORKERS.
>>FOR WORKERS.
>>BREANNA FOR WORKERS.
>>BREANNA WESTBROOK FOR WORKERS.
>>BREANNA WESTBROOK HAS FOR WORKERS.
>>BREANNA WESTBROOK HAS WORKED>>BREANNA WESTBROOK HAS WORKED>>BREANNA WESTBROOK HAS WORKED
IN>>BREANNA WESTBROOK HAS WORKED
IN THE>>BREANNA WESTBROOK HAS WORKED
IN THE CAR>>BREANNA WESTBROOK HAS WORKED
IN THE CAR INDUSTRY>>BREANNA WESTBROOK HAS WORKED
IN THE CAR INDUSTRY FOR>>BREANNA WESTBROOK HAS WORKED
IN THE CAR INDUSTRY FOR A IN THE CAR INDUSTRY FOR A IN THE CAR INDUSTRY FOR A
DECADE. DECADE. DECADE.
>>DECADE.
>>IT DECADE.
>>IT IS DECADE.
>>IT IS DIFFICULT DECADE.
>>IT IS DIFFICULT BECAUSE DECADE.
>>IT IS DIFFICULT BECAUSE OF>>IT IS DIFFICULT BECAUSE OF>>IT IS DIFFICULT BECAUSE OF
WHO>>IT IS DIFFICULT BECAUSE OF
WHO I>>IT IS DIFFICULT BECAUSE OF
WHO I AM. WHO I AM. WHO I AM.
IT WHO I AM.
IT IS WHO I AM.
IT IS NOT WHO I AM.
IT IS NOT GOOD. IT IS NOT GOOD. IT IS NOT GOOD.
>>IT IS NOT GOOD.
>>WESTBROOK IT IS NOT GOOD.
>>WESTBROOK BELIEVES IT IS NOT GOOD.
>>WESTBROOK BELIEVES HER>>WESTBROOK BELIEVES HER>>WESTBROOK BELIEVES HER
GENDER>>WESTBROOK BELIEVES HER
GENDER IDENTITY>>WESTBROOK BELIEVES HER
GENDER IDENTITY IS>>WESTBROOK BELIEVES HER
GENDER IDENTITY IS A>>WESTBROOK BELIEVES HER
GENDER IDENTITY IS A PROBLEM GENDER IDENTITY IS A PROBLEM GENDER IDENTITY IS A PROBLEM
FOR GENDER IDENTITY IS A PROBLEM
FOR EMPLOYERS. FOR EMPLOYERS. FOR EMPLOYERS.
THE FOR EMPLOYERS.
THE U.S. FOR EMPLOYERS.
THE U.S. SUPREME FOR EMPLOYERS.
THE U.S. SUPREME COURT FOR EMPLOYERS.
THE U.S. SUPREME COURT COULD THE U.S. SUPREME COURT COULD THE U.S. SUPREME COURT COULD
CHANGE THE U.S. SUPREME COURT COULD
CHANGE THAT. CHANGE THAT. CHANGE THAT.
ON CHANGE THAT.
ON TUESDAY CHANGE THAT.
ON TUESDAY THE CHANGE THAT.
ON TUESDAY THE JUSTICES CHANGE THAT.
ON TUESDAY THE JUSTICES HEARD ON TUESDAY THE JUSTICES HEARD ON TUESDAY THE JUSTICES HEARD
THE ON TUESDAY THE JUSTICES HEARD
THE CASE ON TUESDAY THE JUSTICES HEARD
THE CASE OF ON TUESDAY THE JUSTICES HEARD
THE CASE OF AMY ON TUESDAY THE JUSTICES HEARD
THE CASE OF AMY STEVENS, ON TUESDAY THE JUSTICES HEARD
THE CASE OF AMY STEVENS, FIRED THE CASE OF AMY STEVENS, FIRED THE CASE OF AMY STEVENS, FIRED
BY THE CASE OF AMY STEVENS, FIRED
BY A THE CASE OF AMY STEVENS, FIRED
BY A MICHIGAN THE CASE OF AMY STEVENS, FIRED
BY A MICHIGAN FUNERAL THE CASE OF AMY STEVENS, FIRED
BY A MICHIGAN FUNERAL HOME BY A MICHIGAN FUNERAL HOME BY A MICHIGAN FUNERAL HOME
AFTER BY A MICHIGAN FUNERAL HOME
AFTER TELLING BY A MICHIGAN FUNERAL HOME
AFTER TELLING HER BY A MICHIGAN FUNERAL HOME
AFTER TELLING HER BOSS BY A MICHIGAN FUNERAL HOME
AFTER TELLING HER BOSS SHE BY A MICHIGAN FUNERAL HOME
AFTER TELLING HER BOSS SHE WAS AFTER TELLING HER BOSS SHE WAS AFTER TELLING HER BOSS SHE WAS
TRANSGENDER. TRANSGENDER. TRANSGENDER.
SHE TRANSGENDER.
SHE OFFERS TRANSGENDER.
SHE OFFERS THE TRANSGENDER.
SHE OFFERS THE 1964 TRANSGENDER.
SHE OFFERS THE 1964 CIVIL SHE OFFERS THE 1964 CIVIL SHE OFFERS THE 1964 CIVIL
RIGHTS SHE OFFERS THE 1964 CIVIL
RIGHTS LAW SHE OFFERS THE 1964 CIVIL
RIGHTS LAW SHOULD SHE OFFERS THE 1964 CIVIL
RIGHTS LAW SHOULD COVER SHE OFFERS THE 1964 CIVIL
RIGHTS LAW SHOULD COVER GENDER RIGHTS LAW SHOULD COVER GENDER RIGHTS LAW SHOULD COVER GENDER
IDENTITY. IDENTITY. IDENTITY.
>>IDENTITY.
>>WHAT IDENTITY.
>>WHAT HAPPENED IDENTITY.
>>WHAT HAPPENED TO IDENTITY.
>>WHAT HAPPENED TO ME IDENTITY.
>>WHAT HAPPENED TO ME IS>>WHAT HAPPENED TO ME IS>>WHAT HAPPENED TO ME IS
WRONG. WRONG. WRONG.
>>WRONG.
>>SHE WRONG.
>>SHE CHANGED WRONG.
>>SHE CHANGED HER WRONG.
>>SHE CHANGED HER ROBE WRONG.
>>SHE CHANGED HER ROBE AFTER>>SHE CHANGED HER ROBE AFTER>>SHE CHANGED HER ROBE AFTER
DRESSING>>SHE CHANGED HER ROBE AFTER
DRESSING AS>>SHE CHANGED HER ROBE AFTER
DRESSING AS A>>SHE CHANGED HER ROBE AFTER
DRESSING AS A MAN>>SHE CHANGED HER ROBE AFTER
DRESSING AS A MAN FOR>>SHE CHANGED HER ROBE AFTER
DRESSING AS A MAN FOR YEARS. DRESSING AS A MAN FOR YEARS. DRESSING AS A MAN FOR YEARS.
>>DRESSING AS A MAN FOR YEARS.
>>IT DRESSING AS A MAN FOR YEARS.
>>IT IS DRESSING AS A MAN FOR YEARS.
>>IT IS AN DRESSING AS A MAN FOR YEARS.
>>IT IS AN INTENT DRESSING AS A MAN FOR YEARS.
>>IT IS AN INTENT TO DRESSING AS A MAN FOR YEARS.
>>IT IS AN INTENT TO VIOLATE>>IT IS AN INTENT TO VIOLATE>>IT IS AN INTENT TO VIOLATE
THE>>IT IS AN INTENT TO VIOLATE
THE DRESS>>IT IS AN INTENT TO VIOLATE
THE DRESS CODE>>IT IS AN INTENT TO VIOLATE
THE DRESS CODE BY>>IT IS AN INTENT TO VIOLATE
THE DRESS CODE BY DRESSING>>IT IS AN INTENT TO VIOLATE
THE DRESS CODE BY DRESSING AND THE DRESS CODE BY DRESSING AND THE DRESS CODE BY DRESSING AND
PRESENTING THE DRESS CODE BY DRESSING AND
PRESENTING AS THE DRESS CODE BY DRESSING AND
PRESENTING AS A THE DRESS CODE BY DRESSING AND
PRESENTING AS A WOMAN THE DRESS CODE BY DRESSING AND
PRESENTING AS A WOMAN WHEN PRESENTING AS A WOMAN WHEN PRESENTING AS A WOMAN WHEN
WORKING PRESENTING AS A WOMAN WHEN
WORKING WITH PRESENTING AS A WOMAN WHEN
WORKING WITH GRIEVING PRESENTING AS A WOMAN WHEN
WORKING WITH GRIEVING FAMILIES. WORKING WITH GRIEVING FAMILIES. WORKING WITH GRIEVING FAMILIES.
>>WORKING WITH GRIEVING FAMILIES.
>>BREANNA WORKING WITH GRIEVING FAMILIES.
>>BREANNA WESTBROOK WORKING WITH GRIEVING FAMILIES.
>>BREANNA WESTBROOK WANTS WORKING WITH GRIEVING FAMILIES.
>>BREANNA WESTBROOK WANTS THE>>BREANNA WESTBROOK WANTS THE>>BREANNA WESTBROOK WANTS THE
HIGH>>BREANNA WESTBROOK WANTS THE
HIGH COURT>>BREANNA WESTBROOK WANTS THE
HIGH COURT TO>>BREANNA WESTBROOK WANTS THE
HIGH COURT TO DO. HIGH COURT TO DO. HIGH COURT TO DO.
>>HIGH COURT TO DO.
>>TRANSGENDERS HIGH COURT TO DO.
>>TRANSGENDERS LOOK HIGH COURT TO DO.
>>TRANSGENDERS LOOK LIKE>>TRANSGENDERS LOOK LIKE>>TRANSGENDERS LOOK LIKE
ANYBODY>>TRANSGENDERS LOOK LIKE
ANYBODY ELSE>>TRANSGENDERS LOOK LIKE
ANYBODY ELSE AND>>TRANSGENDERS LOOK LIKE
ANYBODY ELSE AND WE>>TRANSGENDERS LOOK LIKE
ANYBODY ELSE AND WE DESERVE ANYBODY ELSE AND WE DESERVE ANYBODY ELSE AND WE DESERVE
PROTECTION ANYBODY ELSE AND WE DESERVE
PROTECTION AS ANYBODY ELSE AND WE DESERVE
PROTECTION AS ANY ANYBODY ELSE AND WE DESERVE
PROTECTION AS ANY OTHER ANYBODY ELSE AND WE DESERVE
PROTECTION AS ANY OTHER PERSON PROTECTION AS ANY OTHER PERSON PROTECTION AS ANY OTHER PERSON
IN PROTECTION AS ANY OTHER PERSON
IN THE PROTECTION AS ANY OTHER PERSON
IN THE UNITED PROTECTION AS ANY OTHER PERSON
IN THE UNITED STATES PROTECTION AS ANY OTHER PERSON
IN THE UNITED STATES OF IN THE UNITED STATES OF IN THE UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA. AMERICA. AMERICA.
>>AMERICA.
>>WHAT AMERICA.
>>WHAT WOULD AMERICA.
>>WHAT WOULD THAT AMERICA.
>>WHAT WOULD THAT MEAN AMERICA.
>>WHAT WOULD THAT MEAN TO AMERICA.
>>WHAT WOULD THAT MEAN TO HER?>>WHAT WOULD THAT MEAN TO HER?>>WHAT WOULD THAT MEAN TO HER?
>>>>WHAT WOULD THAT MEAN TO HER?
>>I>>WHAT WOULD THAT MEAN TO HER?
>>I DON’T>>WHAT WOULD THAT MEAN TO HER?
>>I DON’T THINK>>WHAT WOULD THAT MEAN TO HER?
>>I DON’T THINK IT>>WHAT WOULD THAT MEAN TO HER?
>>I DON’T THINK IT WILL>>WHAT WOULD THAT MEAN TO HER?
>>I DON’T THINK IT WILL CHANGE>>I DON’T THINK IT WILL CHANGE>>I DON’T THINK IT WILL CHANGE
IT>>I DON’T THINK IT WILL CHANGE
IT IMMEDIATELY>>I DON’T THINK IT WILL CHANGE
IT IMMEDIATELY BUT>>I DON’T THINK IT WILL CHANGE
IT IMMEDIATELY BUT IT>>I DON’T THINK IT WILL CHANGE
IT IMMEDIATELY BUT IT WILL IT IMMEDIATELY BUT IT WILL IT IMMEDIATELY BUT IT WILL
CONTINUE IT IMMEDIATELY BUT IT WILL
CONTINUE TO IT IMMEDIATELY BUT IT WILL
CONTINUE TO CHANGE IT IMMEDIATELY BUT IT WILL
CONTINUE TO CHANGE THE CONTINUE TO CHANGE THE CONTINUE TO CHANGE THE
CONVERSATION. CONVERSATION. CONVERSATION.
>>CONVERSATION.
>>THE CONVERSATION.
>>THE FUNERAL CONVERSATION.
>>THE FUNERAL HOME’S CONVERSATION.
>>THE FUNERAL HOME’S ATTORNEY>>THE FUNERAL HOME’S ATTORNEY>>THE FUNERAL HOME’S ATTORNEY
WAS>>THE FUNERAL HOME’S ATTORNEY
WAS SUPPLIED>>THE FUNERAL HOME’S ATTORNEY
WAS SUPPLIED BY>>THE FUNERAL HOME’S ATTORNEY
WAS SUPPLIED BY SCOTTSDALE WAS SUPPLIED BY SCOTTSDALE WAS SUPPLIED BY SCOTTSDALE
BASED WAS SUPPLIED BY SCOTTSDALE
BASED ALLIANCE WAS SUPPLIED BY SCOTTSDALE
BASED ALLIANCE FREEDOM. BASED ALLIANCE FREEDOM. BASED ALLIANCE FREEDOM.
THE BASED ALLIANCE FREEDOM.
THE CHRISTIAN BASED ALLIANCE FREEDOM.
THE CHRISTIAN ADVOCACY BASED ALLIANCE FREEDOM.
THE CHRISTIAN ADVOCACY GROUP THE CHRISTIAN ADVOCACY GROUP THE CHRISTIAN ADVOCACY GROUP
THAT THE CHRISTIAN ADVOCACY GROUP
THAT TRAVELED THE CHRISTIAN ADVOCACY GROUP
THAT TRAVELED PHOENIX’S THE CHRISTIAN ADVOCACY GROUP
THAT TRAVELED PHOENIX’S CIVIL THAT TRAVELED PHOENIX’S CIVIL THAT TRAVELED PHOENIX’S CIVIL
RIGHTS THAT TRAVELED PHOENIX’S CIVIL
RIGHTS ORDINANCE. RIGHTS ORDINANCE. RIGHTS ORDINANCE.
U.S. RIGHTS ORDINANCE.
U.S. SUPREME RIGHTS ORDINANCE.
U.S. SUPREME COURT RIGHTS ORDINANCE.
U.S. SUPREME COURT ON

Only registered users can comment.

  1. if you own a private business and do not take in federal dollars then you should be able to hire and fire anyone you want for any reason

    makes no sense we effectively allow hate speech under the first amendment yet you cannot practice it if you own a business

  2. Here's a thought……maybe, if you weren't a man dressed like a woman, we wouldn't be having this conversation……just an observation…..

  3. What does this really mean? If they can't do their jobs because of their mental health problems, you can't fire them. If they miss months at a time to heal from multiple genital mutilation surgeries, you can't fire them. If they come to work in drag and violate dress codes, you can't fire them. If a 400 lbs linebacker-looking man comes to work wearing a wig and you correctly refer to them as a man, or a 90 lbs woman with double-D breasts comes to work with short butch hair and you correctly refer to them as the gender they were born as/what's on their birth certificate/what their DNA states them to be, they can sue you. Welcome to 🤡🌎.

  4. It's funny how these people in the comments are being hateful, picture this .. what if this wasnyour child that was being fired, beaten to a bloody pulp or killed in a very violent manner? I believe you all would have a change of hearts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *